fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
  

Archive 2019 · Alternate camera bodies for Leica M lenses

  
 
AcuteShadows
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Alternate camera bodies for Leica M lenses


Desmolicious wrote:
18mm asph, 28mm 2.8 asph, 35mm cron asph, 50 1.4 asph, various old Cron 50s.
I havent tried my non Leica M lenses - wait I did try the 7A 50 1.1. That was ok

Maybe these are the wrong M lenses for the Z7 but I already had them. And no way would I buy M
lenses specifically for the Z7....


From my own experience, I can say that the Elmarit 2.8/28 shows some smearing in the corners, which is not present with the Summicron 2/28. 18mm is probably a challenge due to the wide angle. I think I tested the Summicron 2/35 ASPH and the Summilux 1.4/50 and decided against them due to a combination of performance and price considerations, but I cannot definitely say they do not work on Z7. Older Lenses, which are designed for film, often have more oblique angles of incidence on the sensor and do not show optimal performance on Leica digital cameras, and the same is probably true for the Z7.

I think it's worth considering buying M lenses for the Nikon Z, although M lenses of course are best on Leica M bodies.




Nov 19, 2019 at 10:42 PM
AcuteShadows
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · Alternate camera bodies for Leica M lenses


Considering the Techart AF adapter, I would be worried that, while it moves the focus plane, it doesn't produce the concurrent change in the relative positions of the lens groups (most importantly floating elements), possibly introducing aberrations. So it may work well with some lenses, but probably not for all of them.

Rynleung wrote:
Why are you not a fan? I was looking at the A7iii and seems you can 1) touch the screen to focus with the techart af adapter 2) shut off magnification if needed

Is that true? 🤯






Nov 19, 2019 at 10:49 PM
Sauseschritt
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Alternate camera bodies for Leica M lenses


Rynleung wrote:
To be clear, i want to take pics of moving objects like pets and kids with Leica lens. I found it very difficult with my M9, but I am not sure if M10 will be that different. That’s why I have this question.

Why yes, that would be difficult to do with manual lenses, on any system.

Try stopping the lens down.



Nov 20, 2019 at 05:19 AM
rscheffler
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Alternate camera bodies for Leica M lenses


coogee wrote:
I'd just stick my M9 on ISO800, scale focus and embrace the beauty of sometimes missing focus on a shot, kids and cats are sometimes blurry imho. Otherwise, good luck, get some awesome Fuji camera perhaps?


That's pretty much was I was going to suggest. Additionally, wider lenses and stopping down a bit make hitting focus a bit easier. But we don't know what kind of image look the OP wants to specifically achieve. Maybe he wants to shoot everything with a 50/1.4 wide open?



Nov 20, 2019 at 07:54 PM
RexGig0
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #5 · Alternate camera bodies for Leica M lenses


Rynleung wrote:
To be clear, i want to take pics of moving objects like pets and kids with Leica lens. I found it very difficult with my M9, but I am not sure if M10 will be that different. That’s why I have this question.


Well, you may already be acquainted with these techniques, but I reckoned that I should ask if you have tried setting the aperture for ample DOF, and pre-setting the distance, before taking the shot, or, when conditions permit, keeping the lens set at hyper-focal? Trying to focus on moving pets and children, with a rangefinder, or with a viewfinder, is a formidable challenge, regardless of the camera brand. This works better with wider-angle lenses, which have more DOF than normal and telephoto lenses.

An example is to use a 28mm lens, with the aperture of f/8, and the distance set at about 12 to 15 feet. Everything from six feet to infinity should be within acceptable focus. If a subject is closer than six feet, move the focusing tab to the three-feet mark. A 35mm lens will less DOF, for any given distance.

This is independent of camera or lens brand. I often used manual-focus Nikon lenses, with a Novoflex adapter, on Canon DSLRs. (Manual-focus Nikkors were an economical way for my wife and I to share lenses. Her employer issued Nikon DSLRs, and I was using a bag of pre-owned Canon stuff.)

The M10 has a better viewfinder experience, in my opinion, than the M9, especially as I normally shoot while wearing prescription eyeglasses. I only experimented with pre-owned M9 cameras, at a nearby camera store. It was the availability of a really nice pre-owned Summilix-M 50mm ASPH that prompted me to add the Leica system, and I started with an M10 body.

Edited to add: A 50mm lens, or longer, has little-enough DOF to make it necessary to use the viewfinder to achieve acceptable focus. The longest lens I will use, by setting the distance scale, is a 45mm, though it is not Leica, but a Nikkor, a “pancake” 45mm f/2.8P (AI-P) lens, which protrudes little more than a body cap, when in place on my D5.



Nov 22, 2019 at 11:29 AM
mapgraphs
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Alternate camera bodies for Leica M lenses



Rynleung wrote:
To be clear, i want to take pics of moving objects like pets and kids with Leica lens. I found it very difficult with my M9, but I am not sure if M10 will be that different. That’s why I have this question.


If you are not practicing how to rack focus with moving objects, then no, the M10 probably won't do any better. Rack focus can be very quick and very accurate - with a lot of practice and knowing the lenses.



Nov 22, 2019 at 12:47 PM
1              end




FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account