It seems that the copies of both Tamron and Sigma are not very consistent in terms of quality. I don't know how to judge all these different information.
I guess I did get a good copy of the Sigma and bad of the Tamron. The Tamron at 2.8 was very soft compared to the Sigma. This was the first thing that stood out, then upon checking sharpness and corners, the Sigma kept taking the lead.