p.24 #13 · Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
Ronny Olsson wrote:
Thanks Dave
I use for most part 27mm
Thanks Ronny - that's an interesting length. And since this is a 100-300 thread I might as well post an old CYZ 100-300 macro (back in my Canon days) using a 20mm extension tube. Dave
p.24 #18 · Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
Fred Miranda wrote:
Sony 100-400 GM vs Contax 100-300 at 200mm @f/8
Out of curiosity, do you recall if your 100-400 sharpened up noticeably when closing down past f/8 in the 200-300mm range? I'm back and forth thinking about buying one. I have rented it twice and both times had copies that were weak in this range outside of the center.
p.24 #19 · Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
Has anyone tried this lens on Fuji? Looking for a nice zoom of this focal range and not fancying the 100-400 (50% heavier and 50% more expensive used) For only landscape use, so purely whatever aperture is sharpest. Currently using C/Y 28mm 2.8 (could be sharper tbh), 50mm 1.7 and 85mm 2.8 (easily best lens I've ever used take for the flaring)
p.24 #20 · Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
ketang wrote:
Out of curiosity, do you recall if your 100-400 sharpened up noticeably when closing down past f/8 in the 200-300mm range? I'm back and forth thinking about buying one. I have rented it twice and both times had copies that were weak in this range outside of the center.
Yes, the 100-400 GM stopped down does improve at mid and extreme corners at the 200-300mm range.
