agelessphotog Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Well, I just sold my 200 F2 because of this lens. After my sample shots, I kept having to go back and fourth to try to see which I liked better. The 200 or the 105. I kind of like the compression better on the 200, but I don't know, for some reason I kind of liked the 105 shots a little more, I can't even tell you why. Maybe it's the "character" it has, or the warmer colors, maybe both. But at any rate I hated shooting with the 200 F2, it was fine for some shoots, but the long ones it got to be grueling when I started doing it every day during busy seasons. I figured if they are that close to me, why keep it when I can get 4k for selling it. The 105 is just so much lighter. I am also keeping an eye on the Sigma 135, but honestly even with the little more compression I don't know if I will like it as much as the 105, might end up passing on it. Especially if the AF isn't as accurate, i'm not trying to play musical Sigma 135's. I have heard of people having to trade Sigma Art lenses in more than Nikons to try to get a good copy.
|