as in "... that’s beyond the naked human eye’s ability to distinguish", and "you really need a 3-5x magnifying loupe to fully appreciate how much detail is in one of these prints".
There are things that can be measured or even seen if they are blown up enough that are invisible in an actual print.
I can tell you with certainty that if printing at 720 ppi print resolution (at even higher dpi printer resolution) made a significant or even visible difference that virtually every serious printer would do it. It doesn't. They don't. ;-)
gdanmitchell wrote:
There are things that can be measured or even seen if they are blown up enough that are invisible in an actual print.
I can tell you with certainty that if printing at 720 ppi print resolution (at even higher dpi printer resolution) made a significant or even visible difference that virtually every serious printer would do it. It doesn't. They don't. ;-)
Dan
"There’s also a subtle but noticeable difference in color between the three; the higher the resolution, the more subtle and rich colours appear. This is easily explained: the more ink dots you can lay down, the finer the tonal and spectral gradations are possible. Print resolution affects tonality.
◾At 6″ viewing distance, which is about the limit for most people’s eyes, the 360PPI image is clearly resolution image. The 720PPI image still appears to have more detail – it is actually at about the practical limit of what a person with perfect eyesight can resolve, and also (for now) the limits of the hardware and media"
So you think this guy is bs? I'd like to know how much print resolution the human eye can resolve. Measured with 100% eyesight. (distance independent).
