fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              25              27              40       41       end
  

Archive 2014 · Zeiss Loxia line

  
 
Taylor Sherman
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.26 #1 · Zeiss Loxia line


I'm glad to find that subtle changes can make a big difference and that hopefully the lenses will work well on the current A7 sensors. Not sure i'll get either of these, but I am back to being fairly excited about the wider options.




Sep 02, 2014 at 01:18 PM
JonPB
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #2 · Zeiss Loxia line


To me, the spherical aberrations are annoyingly prominent. This shot in particular makes me think of the Takumar 50/1.4, a $100 lens that's probably built as well as the Loxia. Is this just my pet peeve or are other folks bothered by the green fringing around everything that's out of focus in the background, particularly the chrome?

I'm both pleased and disappointed at the same time. Pleased that I don't need to start budgeting for this lens; disappointed that Zeiss can't do better for ~$1000. But I suspect those flaws may just strike me wrong when nobody else notices. :-)

-Jon



Sep 02, 2014 at 01:20 PM
ecarlino
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.26 #3 · Zeiss Loxia line


adamdewilde wrote:
Hoping that by the time the Loxia lenses come out, Sony has something else out other then the A7/r/s.


let's hope Sony gets something out sooner than later.....

btw - since there are so many smart guys on this thread - I was wondering how people who have a lot of experience with Zeiss feel about the Sony Zeiss FE 35 f/2.8?

35mm is my favorite foc len. I had it covered w/ a Nikon 2.8 zoom which was OK, the Sigma 35/1.4 was sharp, bordering on harsh - the FE 35/2.8 was a lot of fun (while I had it).

I've never had a proper Zeiss lens and am interested in the new Loxia - but I'm wondering how people who are familiar w/ the Zeiss look feel about the photos they've seen from the 35/2.8 (I realize it was designed by Sony).

Thank you.



Sep 02, 2014 at 02:10 PM
uhoh7
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #4 · Zeiss Loxia line


Matt Grum wrote:
The only source I've seen for the thickness of the A7R filter stack is the LensRentals blog post which states it is approximately 3mm but is very difficult to measure. Sounds like it could actually be 2.5mm

It seems possible that the stacks are the same height across Sony sensors but slight differences in filter composition, AA filtration and pixel pitch give rise to the differences in rangefinder lens performance between the different A7 bodies.


Pretty sure they're just referring to the A7, A7R and A7s, which may well all have 2.5mm stacks.



where do we have these figures from?

When I spoke with maxmax, I think they said the A7s were 1.7mm, while an M9 is .8mm

dug up the conversation:

"Dan: (from maxmax)
Hi Charlie,

I have gotten some questions about this from others as well.

The Sony A7 ICF/AA stack is 1.75mm thick which is relatively thick. The lens flange to sensor distance is also short. If you think about the path of light exiting the lens as it goes to the sensor, it has to pass through the ICF/AA. If the light is going through the center, then the path is the shortest. As you move toward the sensor edges, the light has to travel at greater distance because the light is going through the ICF/AA at an angle. The effect is the same as if the ICF/AA stack changes thickness getting thicker towards the edges. The lens design and aperture also will affect this. A wide aperture longer lens will have less of a problem than a small aperture wide angle lens.

When we do an HR conversion, we remove the stock ICF/AA and replace it with a new ICF-Only having the exact same thickness. If you don't use the correct thickness, then you change the focal plane of the camera. So, our HR conversion AF will work correctly. Biggest downside on HR, and this changes depending on the camera ICF/AA design, is that the AA part of the stack is clear while the ICF has a teal tint. The new ICF-Only has a thicker ICF which shifts WB toward the cyan. Most just set a custom WB if it is an issue, but some don't like it. The thinner the ICF/AA stack, the less of a color shift.

To fix the A7, you would need to go with a thinner ICF. A thinner ICF is going to move the focal plane towards the lens. To get correct focus, you would need to move the sensor closer to the lens which is hard to do on the A7. You would have to either mill the sensor mounting points and modify the camera body sensor mounting points. Neither is an attractive option. Possible, but it would be a lot of work and easy to spend a lot of time trying to get it just right.

The Sony conversions are $550 because their bodies are all really hard to take apart."

He also said he could go ultra-thin, and install a .6mm cover.

"Dan:
Hi Charlie,

If I could put and a thin ICF and move the sensor closer to the lens, then the camera would focus. If put in a thinner ICF, then the camera will become near-sited. You would need to focus past infinity for focus or use one of those adapters that moves the lens back and forth. The thickness of the ICF/AA stack is the problem - you would still have the issue with a thinner ICF, but not as bad.

A quick check shows I have a 0.58mm ICF that I can cut to fit.

Most camera ICF/AA stack have a teal tint to the ICF layer. On a DLSR, typically, there is something like BG38 IR absorbing glass which has a teal tint and then vapor deposition coatings to help block IR as well. Since I put in a new ICF only that has the same thickness as the stock ICF/AA, the WB gets more teal. If I used 0.59mm, I don't think you would see much WB shift. There would be some shift somewhere because the stack is changing. Also, not sure if the Sony auto WB is off the sensor anyhow rather than a separate sensor like a typical DLSR."





Sep 02, 2014 at 02:27 PM
douglasf13
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #5 · Zeiss Loxia line


uhoh7 wrote:
where do we have these figures from?

When I spoke with maxmax, I think they said the A7s were 1.7mm, while an M9 is .8mm

dug up the conversation:

"Dan: (from maxmax)
Hi Charlie,

I have gotten some questions about this from others as well.

The Sony A7 ICF/AA stack is 1.75mm thick which is relatively thick. The lens flange to sensor distance is also short. If you think about the path of light exiting the lens as it goes to the sensor, it has to pass through the ICF/AA. If the light is going through the center, then the path is the shortest. As you
...Show more

Brian Caldwell, of Coastal Optics and Speedbooster fame, did the measurements and got 2.55. However, there is some error involved:

"The sensor optical measurements are made by Brian Caldwell and measure the optical equivalent as if the sensor stack was made of glass with a 1.52 refractile index. The actual physical measurements may be a little different depending upon what types of glass were actually used."



Sep 02, 2014 at 02:37 PM
rscheffler
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #6 · Zeiss Loxia line


Wasn't there something about there being a difference between 'optical path' thickness and actual physical thickness? Could that be a source of confusion for such measurements.?

Edit, looks like Douglas was thinking similarly

Or, maybe Zeiss knows something we don't yet (about future sensors)?
Or, they're generalizing?

Jon - I don't think it's a matter of no one else noticing this. Many here are very familiar with Planar 50s and it's an aspect of the design. For others, it's an acceptable exchange for what they like about typical Planar character.

Charlie, I wonder if such thin glass will have sufficient IR absorption/blocking? Would be interesting to try though, since you've got a considerable M system collection now... try it and let us know!



Sep 02, 2014 at 02:46 PM
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #7 · Zeiss Loxia line


ecarlino wrote:
let's hope Sony gets something out sooner than later.....

btw - since there are so many smart guys on this thread - I was wondering how people who have a lot of experience with Zeiss feel about the Sony Zeiss FE 35 f/2.8?

35mm is my favorite foc len. I had it covered w/ a Nikon 2.8 zoom which was OK, the Sigma 35/1.4 was sharp, bordering on harsh - the FE 35/2.8 was a lot of fun (while I had it).

I've never had a proper Zeiss lens and am interested in the new Loxia - but I'm wondering how people who
...Show more

i've owned 3 zeiss 35mm lenses: the contax g 35/2, c/y 35/1.4, and the rx1. i've also played with the ZF and zm 35/2.

my biggest conclusion from using all those lenses is that zeiss doesn't have a consistent vision for what a 35mm lens should be. the g35 is optimized for mid distance stopped down shooting. the c/y 35/1.4 is the best portrait lens i've ever used with incredible pop at short to mid distance, smooth transitions to oof, and it's decent landscape lens. the ZF 35/2 is an extremely good all rounder with extreme contrast that is better at mid distance than infinity. the zm 35/2 seems optimized for shooting landscapes at infinity, where its unbeatable. the rx1 is the best of the bunch (and possibly designed by sony?) it is almost as good for portraits as the c/y 35/1.4 and almost as good for landscape as the zm 35/2. it's consistently sharp and contrasty across the frame at all apertures and focus distances and has smoother bokeh than the others by a long shot.

i've not shot with the FE 35/2.8, so i can't say for sure how it compares. it seems to be optimized for maximum contrast and sharpness in the center 2/3 of the frame at mid distance sacrificing bokeh and corners/infinity a bit. could be sort of like a cross between the ZF 35/2 and the zm 35/2.8. i'd have to look at more images or shoot with it to come to a real conclusion.




Sep 02, 2014 at 03:01 PM
coffeeshakes
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #8 · Zeiss Loxia line


sebboh wrote:
the rx1 is the best of the bunch (and possibly designed by sony?) it is almost as good for portraits as the c/y 35/1.4 and almost as good for landscape as the zm 35/2. it's consistently sharp and contrasty across the frame at all apertures and focus distances and has smoother bokeh than the others by a long shot.


I haven't used the RX1 myself, but I've been seeing prices drop a bit, and if a successor comes along it will go even further. When you can get a nice fixed 35mm full frame camera with a likely better lens for the same price as the loxia, (or less if you can take aps-c x100s) it starts looking pretty questionable. Personally I'm not super sensitive to different renderings, so that has to be taken into account, but I think I might prefer toying with the RX1 over this zeiss.

Now if it were an 18, 21 or 24... even a stellar 28/2. I'm guessing Zeiss will get my cash eventually.



Sep 02, 2014 at 03:39 PM
ecarlino
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.26 #9 · Zeiss Loxia line


sebboh wrote:
i've owned 3 zeiss 35mm lenses: the contax g 35/2, c/y 35/1.4, and the rx1. i've also played with the ZF and zm 35/2.

my biggest conclusion from using all those lenses is that zeiss doesn't have a consistent vision for what a 35mm lens should be. the g35 is optimized for mid distance stopped down shooting. the c/y 35/1.4 is the best portrait lens i've ever used with incredible pop at short to mid distance, smooth transitions to oof, and it's decent landscape lens. the ZF 35/2 is an extremely good all rounder with extreme contrast that is better at
...Show more

thanks for sharing your experience/knowledge - that's great feedback!
I spend a lot of time searching flickr for specific lenses and comparing IQ and character - but it helps to hear from someone that has owned them.

I think my 1st choice would be an upgraded/improved a7r with the 35mm lens from the RX1 in an FE mount.



Sep 02, 2014 at 03:47 PM
ecarlino
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.26 #10 · Zeiss Loxia line


coffeeshakes wrote:
I haven't used the RX1 myself, but I've been seeing prices drop a bit, and if a successor comes along it will go even further. When you can get a nice fixed 35mm full frame camera with a likely better lens for the same price as the loxia, (or less if you can take aps-c x100s) it starts looking pretty questionable. Personally I'm not super sensitive to different renderings, so that has to be taken into account, but I think I might prefer toying with the RX1 over this zeiss.

Now if it were an 18, 21 or 24... even a
...Show more

I'm with you - that 35mm lens on the Rx1 has great detail and character and a used rx1 vs a new zeiss probably makes sense - the only thing stopping me is I don't care for the external EVF: if it had a built in an high quality EVF, it'd be a no-brainer for me.

i'd love for the next RX to be a set of 3 - all with highly optimized (both in IQ and size) lenses and a camera body that improves upon the A7 series: in focal lengths of 18mm, 35mm and 85mm.




Sep 02, 2014 at 03:52 PM
Jochenb
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #11 · Zeiss Loxia line


I'm coming from great 35mm lenses like the Zeiss 35/1.4 Distagon and 35/2 Sonnar (RX1). If you're used to (and love) their smoothness... almost all the other 35mm lenses look harsh in comparison. This new Loxia 35/2 being no exception.


Sep 02, 2014 at 04:11 PM
rishio media
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #12 · Zeiss Loxia line


Here's a guy who got to preview the lenses:

http://www.cinema5d.com/zeiss-loxia-emount-lenses-announced/

I also like Digilloyd's insights:

http://diglloyd.com/blog/2014/20140902_0854-ZeissLoxia.html

At some point I'd like to sell my 35 2.8 and 55 1.8 and replace them with these. We also might be able to guess which other lenses Zeiss might make based on the fact that they are using a 52mm filter thread on the whole line. That would rule out the 18mm f/4, for example, but might make the 21 f/2.8 or 4.5 more likely.

Edited on Sep 02, 2014 at 05:25 PM · View previous versions



Sep 02, 2014 at 04:40 PM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #13 · Zeiss Loxia line


Lloyd Chamber's review includes this quote, which is almost certainly erroneous:

"The 35mm f/2 Biogon originates as rangefinder lens design (Zeiss ZM 35mm f/2 Biogon for use on Leica M). This is the superb lens design used in the Sony RX1 / RX1R (lovely performer there), though it could incorporate modifications for A7s/A7/A7R system."

Apart from the RX1 lens being a Sonnar, not a Biogon, I also don't think there is much design similarity there, especially looking at the rear of the lens. Anyone?



Sep 02, 2014 at 05:18 PM
wolfloid
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #14 · Zeiss Loxia line


Digilloyd seems to think the RX1/R design is a Biogon and the same design as the new Loxia, whereas Zeiss calls it a Sonnar, which would be a different design.


Sep 02, 2014 at 05:19 PM
snowboarder
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #15 · Zeiss Loxia line


ecarlino wrote:
let's hope Sony gets something out sooner than later.....

btw - since there are so many smart guys on this thread - I was wondering how people who have a lot of experience with Zeiss feel about the Sony Zeiss FE 35 f/2.8?

35mm is my favorite foc len. I had it covered w/ a Nikon 2.8 zoom which was OK, the Sigma 35/1.4 was sharp, bordering on harsh - the FE 35/2.8 was a lot of fun (while I had it).

I've never had a proper Zeiss lens and am interested in the new Loxia - but I'm wondering how people who
...Show more

If you like 35mm just get an RX1R. Period.
I travel with A7R + a bunch of Leica lenses and still keep my RX1R and enjoy it the most. It's that good.






Sep 02, 2014 at 05:27 PM
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #16 · Zeiss Loxia line


the front element of the loxia looks very similar to that of the zm 35/2 and very different from the rx1 front element...

and of course the rx1 has a floating element internal focus while the zm and loxia do not.

i'm sure lloyd just misspoke.




Sep 02, 2014 at 05:28 PM
wolfloid
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #17 · Zeiss Loxia line


I travel with A7R + a bunch of Leica lenses and still keep my RX1R and enjoy it the most. It's that good.

I've also been interested in this camera for a while, but have been put off by the lack of a viewfinder. How do you cope and still enjoy it?



Sep 02, 2014 at 05:30 PM
douglasf13
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #18 · Zeiss Loxia line


carstenw wrote:
Lloyd Chamber's review includes this quote, which is almost certainly erroneous:

"The 35mm f/2 Biogon originates as rangefinder lens design (Zeiss ZM 35mm f/2 Biogon for use on Leica M). This is the superb lens design used in the Sony RX1 / RX1R (lovely performer there), though it could incorporate modifications for A7s/A7/A7R system."

Apart from the RX1 lens being a Sonnar, not a Biogon, I also don't think there is much design similarity there, especially looking at the rear of the lens. Anyone?


He's wrong about the RX1 and Loxia similarity.

Edited on Sep 02, 2014 at 05:33 PM · View previous versions



Sep 02, 2014 at 05:30 PM
snowboarder
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #19 · Zeiss Loxia line


wolfloid wrote:
I've also been interested in this camera for a while, but have been put off by the lack of a viewfinder. How do you cope and still enjoy it?


I have a viewfinder and just don't use it that often. It's great for bright sunny days,
but the image quality is so good I don't care... I use it like a teenage high school girl



Sep 02, 2014 at 05:32 PM
Jochenb
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.26 #20 · Zeiss Loxia line


wolfloid wrote:
I've also been interested in this camera for a while, but have been put off by the lack of a viewfinder. How do you cope and still enjoy it?


How to cope with that? Buying the viewfinder...




Sep 02, 2014 at 05:44 PM
1       2       3              25              27              40       41       end




FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              25              27              40       41       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account