fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              178              180              194       195       end
  

Archive 2013 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless

  
 
nandadevieast
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #1 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


Hi sorry for repeating the Q:
How many presses equals 100% view in playback mode.
Thnx,
Nde



Mar 14, 2014 at 03:33 AM
lsquare
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #2 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


nandadevieast wrote:
Is it possible for some wise forum member to hack these cameras to produce true uncompressed raw files? Is it even possible?


Hopefully the upcoming Sony firmware will address this!



Mar 14, 2014 at 04:41 AM
lsquare
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #3 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


Jeff Kott wrote:
If anyone's interested in seeing how the lens correction profile in Capture One works to eliminate color cast, Phase One just came out with a new concise illustration/tutorial here:

http://blog.phaseone.com/get-perfect-snow-without-color-cast/?utm_source=Apsis&utm_medium=professor_eblast&utm_content=IQP&utm_campaign=w0914_software


Does Lightroom have a similar feature?

I thought PhaseOne sold a product that works with their software to eliminate colorcast and other abnormalities?



Mar 14, 2014 at 04:43 AM
Sami Ruusunen
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #4 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


Alpha_Geist wrote:
As a PP newb, I've recently learned to work in ProPhoto color space (?) in LR and in PS CC, but when you mention "until the output stage" Philip, what do you mean by that


When you shoot RAW there is no color space when you're editing in LR, you choose the colorspace when you export the file as JPG, TIFF, etc. The color space chosen in camera has no effect on RAW, only on preview jpg and histogram.



Mar 14, 2014 at 05:03 AM
Jeff Kott
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #5 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


lsquare wrote:
I thought PhaseOne sold a product that works with their software to eliminate colorcast and other abnormalities?


I've never seen that advertised by Phase One. I use an Expodisc, but any neutral colored piece of plastic should work.



Mar 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM
Alpha_Geist
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #6 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


Sami Ruusunen wrote:
When you shoot RAW there is no color space when you're editing in LR, you choose the colorspace when you export the file as JPG, TIFF, etc. The color space chosen in camera has no effect on RAW, only on preview jpg and histogram.


Ah yes! I was getting confused thinking that there was another "step" prior to exporting to a file that involved another color space. Where's that... ...there's the icon. :P



Mar 14, 2014 at 07:05 PM
robsonj
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #7 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


Fred Miranda wrote:
Samuli,
Very informative post.

The FE 35mm's hood is threaded so you can screw a 40.5mm polarizer on it. If you want to keep your polarizer, just get a 40.5mm to 58mm step-up ring.
Fred


The FE35 lens hood is one of the most innovative things I've seen in photography, its genius.



Mar 14, 2014 at 07:55 PM
snapsy
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.179 #8 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


Sami Ruusunen wrote:
When you shoot RAW there is no color space when you're editing in LR, you choose the colorspace when you export the file as JPG, TIFF, etc. The color space chosen in camera has no effect on RAW, only on preview jpg and histogram.


Actually LR uses ProPhoto for editing raws.



Mar 14, 2014 at 08:08 PM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #9 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless




snapsy wrote:
Actually LR uses ProPhoto for editing raws.


Actually LR uses MelissaRGB for editing RAWs. MelissaRGB is ProPhoto RGB with the sRGB tone curve. For the previous poster, as soon as you modify a file, you must be interpreting the values in it, and as such you are always in some colour space.



Mar 14, 2014 at 11:10 PM
Alpha_Geist
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #10 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


Gotcha!

Thanks guys



Mar 14, 2014 at 11:27 PM
snapsy
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.179 #11 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


carstenw wrote:
Actually LR uses MelissaRGB for editing RAWs. MelissaRGB is ProPhoto RGB with the sRGB tone curve. For the previous poster, as soon as you modify a file, you must be interpreting the values in it, and as such you are always in some colour space.


LR uses ProPhoto for editing RAWs. MelissaRGB is only used for rendering (viewing) and utility functions like the histogram.



Mar 14, 2014 at 11:30 PM
miklar
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #12 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


Jeff Kott wrote:
Thom Hogan has his review of the A7 and A7r posted now:

http://www.sansmirror.com/cameras/a-note-about-camera-reviews/sony-nex-camera-reviews/sony-a7-and-a7r-review.html

The only thing I found surprising is his comment that for normal exposures, 200 is the best ISO setting. DXO shows more dynamic range at 100, so I'm not sure why 200 would be better. If anyone can explain this, I'd appreciate it.


I usually like reading Thom's blog, but do not always agree with his opinions.
His comments regarding the A7r seem to be short of his usual pragmatic approach. While he admits not having used the A7r for any length of time as well referencing data from other sources, not of his own findings and using their data to condemn the compression algorithm used by Sony, is not his usual way.
It's almost as though he is biased against Sony, especially since little of what he has written takes into account his usual laments that neither Canon nor Nikon are keeping up with the times, frequently lamenting how they should follow the example of his favourite "technology" company, Apple.
Since Sony is perhaps the only (with Samsung being the other) truly technology company that actually develops new toys for us and not just software to make them play, it's difficult to take him seriously from here on in.
There are many features the A7(r) have that one could only wish were on DSLRs. Instead of praising Sony for that he only describes a three year old camera as the king of the hill. Indeed Nikon deserves to be praised for having assembled such a good device, but it is still old technology with its core being Sony's sensor.
Yes, the A7(r) have lots of shortcomings when compared to the some DSLRs and hopefully Sony, Nikon and or Canon will add each other's plusses to their devices in the near future.
In the meantime the A7r is my favourite for carrying on my shoulder all day. No, I won't use it for action photography unless it's the only device handy at the time.
One more thing, all that blocked up data due to the "severe" compression, I've yet to see it on a 33 inch print.
And finally, while I would like for Sony to provide us with a choice of a lesser level of compression, but not at the cost of some of the necessary lens to sensor corrections that allows technology to continue to develop products more user friendly than all the wonderful clunkers we work with now.
Cheers



Mar 15, 2014 at 07:37 PM
philip_pj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.179 #13 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


Not often to say this about a post covering many issues, but agree 100%, miklar. I have never seen so much interest in a camera that is not worthy of their interest.

As the DxO data make clear, you give up data quality using higher ISO than necessary - Sony's modern sensors are extremely linear, and the advantages of base ISO are clear to anyone with real world experience of these cameras. On the a7r (once above extended ISO 50) every ISO step up numerically costs you data quality - no exceptions.



Mar 15, 2014 at 09:12 PM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #14 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless




miklar wrote:
I usually like reading Thom's blog, but do not always agree with his opinions.
His comments regarding the A7r seem to be short of his usual pragmatic approach. While he admits not having used the A7r for any length of time as well referencing data from other sources, not of his own findings and using their data to condemn the compression algorithm used by Sony, is not his usual way.
It's almost as though he is biased against Sony, especially since little of what he has written takes into account his usual laments that neither Canon nor Nikon are keeping
...Show more

I think that Thom's review is probably the most lucid and well-considered review of the cameras I have read yet, by quite a distance. I don't always enjoy his reviews, but this one is spot on. I thought that all his comments were very fair, and he made several points not made by the usual copy-cat reviewers, such as some intelligent comments on exactly why the menus could be better, and he explained nicely why FF isn't always a win, in the context of these cameras.

Note that while he does reference external work, he doesn't say that he hasn't seen the compression artifacts himself, and indeed discusses it at some length, giving a strong impression that he has worked with them in PP. I don't see any evidence of bias against Sony, just some comments which reveal that he is aware of their inconsistent system building antics in the past.

Your comment about old technology rings hollow. The D800s still deliver the best image quality, due to Sony's lackluster integration of the same sensor in the A7r, but that is really Sony's own fault. One would normally expect better image quality from an iterated part, three years later, not worse, but Sony didn't deliver. The fact that Sony has more shutter shock than a large pro DSLR is just lame. They shouldn't have released the A7r without EFSC.

In the end, he clearly liked the cameras a lot, but he makes a really good point: why release a camera which pushes resolution as far as is currently possible, when you don't follow up with the necessary implementation and features to extract the most from it? Good cameras, not perfect, and I agree with him: at the moment the A7 is the more complete, and attractive camera of the two. When Sony sorts out the above-mentioned issues, maybe in an A8, I will consider replacing my D800 with it (if the lenses are there by then).

For a Canon users the choices are a bit easier, since Canon's sensor tech is behind, and the A7r is such a large step up. For Nikon D800 owners, the A7r is a step down in most ways, other than size and EVF.



Mar 16, 2014 at 05:51 AM
Sami Ruusunen
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #15 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


snapsy wrote:
Actually LR uses ProPhoto for editing raws.


I was in the belief that RAW itself doesn't have any color space, only the screen previews in LightRoom development module has (Adobe personnel call it Lightroom RGB). When you are exporting the jpg or tiff from lightroom, it should use the original Raw data for the values. If this is incorrect there is a an error in Adobes training material.



Mar 16, 2014 at 07:13 AM
snapsy
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.179 #16 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


carstenw wrote:
I think that Thom's review is probably the most lucid and well-considered review of the cameras I have read yet, by quite a distance. I don't always enjoy his reviews, but this one is spot on. I thought that all his comments were very fair, and he made several points not made by the usual copy-cat reviewers, such as some intelligent comments on exactly why the menus could be better, and he explained nicely why FF isn't always a win, in the context of these cameras.

Note that while he does reference external work, he doesn't say that he hasn't seen
...Show more

I'm a fan of Thom's site and especially of his reviews but he missed the mark on the A7r. He flatly rejected the camera (and withheld his recommendation) based on the shortcomings of Sony's compression algorithm. The problem is he failed to produce any photos which exhibits those shortcomings, instead choosing to discuss theoretical cases where those shortcomings could manifest. He then linked to one of the only photographs available online which demonstrates a problem and even that example isn't horribly objectionable. The only objectionable example I've seen is the one Fred posted in his review, where there were deep clipped shadows next to clipped highlights.

So my first issue with Thom's conclusion is that he overstates the problem significantly. The second problem is that he's applying his review criteria inconsistently. The Nikon D7100 has a horrible shadow banding and tinting issue (Toshiba sensor), which can be seen in some images with only a +2EV push of the shadows. Yet he characterizes it as a problem that can only be seen with a -5EV exposure by "the typical forum poster", and concludes "Let's see, how many times have I done that so far? None, except for the times where I was trying to illustrate the problem ;~).". My question would be, how many times was he even able to illustrate the compression problem on the A7r when trying? The answer is none.



Mar 16, 2014 at 08:19 AM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.179 #17 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


snapsy wrote:
I'm a fan of Thom's site and especially of his reviews but he missed the mark on the A7r. He flatly rejected the camera (and withheld his recommendation) based on the shortcomings of Sony's compression algorithm. The problem is he failed to produce any photos which exhibits those shortcomings, instead choosing to discuss theoretical cases where those shortcomings could manifest. He then linked to one of the only photographs available online which demonstrates a problem and even that example isn't horribly objectionable. The only objectionable example I've seen is the one Fred posted in his review, where there were deep
...Show more

He doesn't need to post evidence to have an opinion, and make a review. He linked to another site, for those interested in reading more, but his reviews are invariably text only, with only photos of the equipment. His point was simply that to put in such a capable sensor, and then to make not one, but a few silly mistakes in the processing and integration just doesn't make any sense. If you read his review again, you will see that he generally liked the cameras, but stops short of recommending the A7r, with which I agree. Someone might enjoy it, but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone, they would have to test it themselves.



Mar 16, 2014 at 11:05 AM
itai195
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.179 #18 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


The D7100 is a consumer DX camera. The A7r is being compared to the D800e. Different standards...


Mar 16, 2014 at 11:24 AM
snapsy
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.179 #19 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


carstenw wrote:
He doesn't need to post evidence to have an opinion, and make a review. He linked to another site, for those interested in reading more, but his reviews are invariably text only, with only photos of the equipment. His point was simply that to put in such a capable sensor, and then to make not one, but a few silly mistakes in the processing and integration just doesn't make any sense. If you read his review again, you will see that he generally liked the cameras, but stops short of recommending the A7r, with which I agree. Someone might enjoy
...Show more

It's not just that he didn't post a photo example but that he couldn't refer to a single image he's taken with the camera in the months that he's had it which demonstrated the issue. At what point does Sony's choice of compression become a silly mistake vs a clever algorithm if its negative side effects are exceedingly rare?



Mar 16, 2014 at 11:28 AM
snapsy
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.179 #20 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless


itai195 wrote:
The D7100 is a consumer DX camera. The A7r is being compared to the D800e. Different standards...


Nikon refers to the D7100 as their flagship DX camera.



Mar 16, 2014 at 11:30 AM
1       2       3              178              180              194       195       end




FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              178              180              194       195       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account