Once installed you need to enter command:
exiftool -All:*Count* filename
where "-All:*Count*" tells exiftool to list all fields containing string "Count" and "filename" is the file you are checking the EXIF-info. Easiest way to do this is to write "exiftool -All:*Count* " (space in the end needed) and then drag and drop your file to terminal window and press enter.
PS. Do not trust the file data unless You have seen personally the photo taken (and monitored that no-one haven't modified it before you got the file) from which the image count is taken from. This is because the values can be faked in computer.
p.167 #7 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless
Jeff Kott wrote:
Miklar,
I've got a suggestion. Why don't you give PhotoNinja a try with your A7r files? I don't care for ACR/Lightroom's rendering and have been using Capture One 7 for my A7r files, but decided to try PhotoNinja and am very pleased with the initial results. If you email them, they will send a two week trial registration code. A7/A7r support is in the latest release candidate which you can download from the site.
Thanks
I've downloaded it and will give it a try.
cheers
p.167 #8 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless
miklar wrote:
That's a good question and I can't give you an answer yet.
To explain why; all my accessories are centered around Nikon's D3 series (I have both the D3s and D3x) including strobes. The D3x's primary purpose is for artwork reproduction and was acquired for its accurate color rendering.
To get color temperature accuracy it is necessary to run the NEF files through Capture NX2 and from there to Photoshop in TIFF format. Adobe's "Camera RAW" seems to do something which is not acceptable to curators or artists.
With the ARW files I've used a RAW converter (at the moment I'm can't remember which one) that creates NEF files and ran them through Capture NX2, the results appeared much better. Sony's "Image Data Converter" is one I'm still struggling with and Capture One 7 is too subjective. In all fairness the only way to be sure is to shoot color charts under controlled lighting and measure the final output with a colorimeter. Something I plan to do in the next couple of weeks.
As a point of note; I did not acquire the A7r as a replacement of the D3x, but as a "walkabout" camera. However, to date the results have been surprisingly good. Notwithstanding its shortcomings if color reproduction turns out to be similar to the D3x, my right wrist and forearm will be even more grateful ...Show more →
Thanks for your answer.
In fact I used the d3x as a walkabout camera (actually my wife's camera) and it is obviously an excellent professional camera, very accurate. The only camera to date I really liked apart from my medium format backs ... But my wife found it really too big ... Colors were a bit on the technical side but very good.
I hope you will find the right workflow for both your work and pleasure, please share your findings !
I ordered one, I will know more in a few days ...
p.167 #15 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless
I think these spots are dust on your front element. Not uncommon to see this pointing into the sun in combo with high f stop. Try cleaning it and taking a similar shot. The flare is normal I guess (don;t have the lens).
p.167 #17 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless
Roger, if you are around, I'm curious about what measures Sony has taken with regard to the weather resistant claims - and I know those can be empty claims by any manufacturer, as you have also pointed out in another article. I didn't see any mention of gaskets in your teardown. I'm mostly curious if there are any obvious steps taken here versus say with the RX1 (which I don't know that you have done a teardown of yet).
Amazing how elegantly simple these FF Sony's are designed. If they can sell enough of them, it's hard to see how they couldn't make a lot more $$ compared to any complex DSLR competitor due to the simple construction, just as you have pointed out.
p.167 #18 · Official: Sony A7 and A7R Fullframe Mirrorless
Tariq Gibran wrote:
Roger, if you are around, I'm curious about what measures Sony has taken with regard to the weather resistant claims - and I know those can be empty claims by any manufacturer, as you have also pointed out in another article. I didn't see any mention of gaskets in your teardown. I'm mostly curious if there are any obvious steps taken here versus say with the RX1 (which I don't know that you have done a teardown of yet).
Amazing how elegantly simple these FF Sony's are designed. If they can sell enough of them, it's hard to see how they couldn't make a lot more $$ compared to any complex DSLR competitor due to the simple construction, just as you have pointed out....Show more →
Tariq, there was no gasketry at all. There's a 1/4" or so overlap on the plastic clamshells (front to back, top assembly over camera) which I assume must be nearly watertight. I was surprised there was not gasket around the plastic cover of the EVF. In that area I think they depend on the soft rubber of the removable viewfinder cover to be a seal. Which it probably is, more or less.
One positive I noted is that the grips are bonded onto the camera. In other cameras the grips are stuck with sticky tape and there are lots of access holes under the grip. And there are far fewer screws in the A7r.
But all that being said, I won't be getting mine wet.
Thanks for the info on the camera, Roger. Makes me feel a tad safer taking mine on some motorbike and horse rides (in a nice pack).