These are great, I wish Id got up to Scotland last year when I was in UK, its the birth place of my grandfather.. I travelled from as far down as lands-end up to Cardiff. I used my X100 on jpeg settings for the whole trip and got some great shots. Perfect travel camera in my opinion
These recent postings sure are making the X100(s) all that more appealing. I had the chance to take a few shots with a borrowed X100 today. I hope to pull some of the images and see how I did. If they are worthy, I will post.
Here's another shot from this weekend. Regardless of all of the criticism that the X-Trans sensor is given, it's a lifesaver for +ISO3200 shots. Trying to shoot bars and pubs in lowlight is such a pain either way but having small, unobtrusive cameras with lowlight capabilities like this is just awesome.
Borrowed a friends X100 for about 30 minutes to try out. Decent little camera, not sure if its my thing (only got to try a small fraction of what I like to shoot with it, might have to bribe for a weekend...) On some of the other shots I took, I was able to see some of the plasticy look...you can kind of see it in the anvil near the front nose deal.
carstenw wrote:
Did you borrow the X100 or the X100S? Because the X100 doesn't have the plastic look... It was the X100 and in some of the slightly OOF areas, it had a plasticy look to it (at least to my eyes). I have seen the examples of faces with the X100s that has the look and some of the images I took with the X100 had the same look... Not every shot, seemed to be at f/2.8 and slightly OOF gave that look.
kwoodard wrote:
It was the X100 and in some of the slightly OOF areas, it had a plasticy look to it (at least to my eyes). I have seen the examples of faces with the X100s that has the look and some of the images I took with the X100 had the same look... Not every shot, seemed to be at f/2.8 and slightly OOF gave that look.
Unusual, because the two cameras have different types of sensors (not just different MP).
