MazeRunner wrote:
^The like button is broken. How did you get so close? A zoo?
Yeah It's a family owned Zoo near me. I did some promotional work for them and made a decent donation so I was able to actually spend time with the Sloth and her baby as well as hold them. I am obsessed with Sloths.
---------------------------------------------
agentbird wrote:
Wow, amazing set Bastian! I love sloths!!
Thanks! Sloths are the best. So gentle and sweet. My life is complete now that I have had the chance to hold one.
Do not be sour of the criticism but several pictures are gaining if a negative curve is applied to your images, the midrange is far too bright in many cases, and some of you need to clean your pictures from cyan cast which is predominate in several pictures, who has seen a blue 200 / 2.0 or 70-200? they are black, or an eagle whose white plumage is towards cyan/blue? Many examples are easy to correct regarding cyan cast and also to get detail in the mid tones.
happy shooting with one of the best lenses there are
still don't get it, why not work with the rock pictures little bit in PP?
here, I put up the same picture and showing the difference, why have a good lens if you not take care of the PP before you show the pictures?
2 of your examples who are to bright in the middle tones and showing less information, and this is 2 jpg Im adjusting, , what can not be done with the raw files? https://picasaweb.google.com/106266083120070292876/PostProcessing?authkey=Gv1sRgCMPKz-nMzruIcQ#6056478478889862898
Thanks! Most certainly...works well with the 80-400G giving me
a light, hand holdable 550mm FX and 825mm DX for BIF & wildlife.
The fact it's gorgeous on the 200 f2/70-200 f2.8 is icing on da cake.
How did you get so close? A zoo?
We took on the new TC-14E III this morning...
