anthonygh wrote:
It will take a long time before print technology matches what is on my screen in my opinion.....but since the two outputs will always be different (monitor vs print) the ultimate print will always be an interpretation of what the screen shows.
I have the first 27" iMac and don't see any need to 'upgrade'..I just took the time to learn how to use it properly and relate the screen image to my printers.
It might not be the quickest machine in the world now..but.I suspect it will be fine for 90% of what I want...I will just have to live with the remaining 10% frustration for the cost benefit! ...Show more →
It depends on what kind of paying clientele you have. If you take a look at the top rate fashion/beauty/commercial stuff, they match perfectly for both print and screen output. Perhaps their retouchers at the Box Studios may have some access to 100% sRGB or even aRGB display devices.
You can verify this simply by picking up the current issue.
If most a Apple monitor is quite saturated , colorful and bright compared to what most people use, and you want to see what most people are seeing, then why on earth would you even consider a Apple monitor. Your logic makes no sense.
