OntheRez Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #12 · Summary of 1D Mark III focus issues, serials #s, repairs, and dot colors? | |
ZoneV_Nikon wrote:
I want to add to my post: The 1d Mark IIN seems like less of a value compared to a (properly functioning) Mark III. For one thing, the IIN is around twice the price of a Mark II, and there isn't enough difference to justify it. For another, it still uses the NiMh batts. Finally, I would guess that Canon won't service the IIN much longer. These companies are supposed to provide at least ten years of guaranteed service from the introduction date, and preferably ten years from discontinuation date. Canon did neither with the Mark II, or the original 1D/1Ds. Hopefully the 1D Mark III and the 1Ds mark II will be supported longer.
And is the 1Ds III affected or not? I hear highly conflicting information.
btw, I'm still seeking links to discussion on the dot colors, serial numbers, issues, etc, if anyone knows where they're hiding. Thanks....Show more →
Hi ZoneV,
I've owned and shot extensively every 1D series camera except the original. They have all served me superbly. I'd say the only difference between them (and it is a major one) is rapidly evolving technology within each up grade.
The 1DIII focus problem (which after quite a bit of controversy Canon stepped up and fixed) has nothing to do with the 1DIIn. It is hard to advise you as to whether or not it represents good value as I don't know what you want to do with the cam and how much you are willing to pay. The IIn has superb AF, creates a very malleable and nice RAW file, has excellent FPS. I used one for about 3 years professionally. It never blinked. It remains one of my all time favorite cameras. It's drawbacks are all new tech related. It does use NiCads (which are widely available at about $40@), it is useable up to about ISO 1600 though 800 is a much more reasonable place to shoot, and yes Canon will drop "official" support for it one day though that is probably at least 2 years away. (Wild ass guess as I have no inside info on Canon's policies.)
I went to the 1DIII for higher ISO performance. It functioned perfectly. Yes it has some nice upgrades: slightly more pixels, usable ISO 3200, micro focus, li-on batteries, and an early live view. I recently replaced it with a 1DIV as I needed even more ISO headroom.
At each level from 1DII thru 1DIV (assuming you get a camera in reasonably good shape) you get superb AF performance, excellent throughput, and an indestructible body. Each step forward - of course - costs more. Where the price/performance balance is, for you, I can't say. I certainly loved the 1DIIn and still think it had the best IQ of the bunch. My current 1DIV is a delight: AF that really can't be beat, throughput, li-on batteries, and all the new tech goodies.
In a nutshell, a 1DIIn has the lowest price and superb IQ up to 800 and sometimes 1600. The 1DIII (with the fixes in place if necessary) is more expensive, but has better batteries and a generous step maybe step and half in headroom. The 1DIV frankly is only matched (or bested) by the mythical 1Dx or the Nikon pro equivalent. (Don't know Nikon model numbers.) Price range: 1DIIn - nice copies at ~ $800USD, 1DIV nice copies ~$3500. It all depends on how much you expect to use it and what you want to do with it. They are all excellent cameras given their technological life.
Robert
|