owyhee wrote:
surf monkey,
I really like your first set of images. Great cityscapes and fantastic angles. Makes me dream of going back to Chicago.
Thanks. All the images on the thread are really showing off the OM-D. I can't keep up.
I'm still getting used to the smaller format, which is quite an adjustment from my 5D2.
Especially post-processing, I'm having issues with chromatic aberration in particular.
I can't wait to unburden my bag on longer backpacking trips and try some remote landscapes as well.
Jman13 wrote:
Love that first one. The 75 is quite an awesome lens, isn't it? I absolutely love mine.
That, it is.
Question though. With many of my OM-D lenses, I find that I get a much lower keeper rate when shooting handheld in low light high ISO situations. Maybe this is to be expected as I'm talking about street shooting but the keeper rate seems significantly lower than my 5D III in the same situation. Again, maybe this is to be expected.
Question though. With many of my OM-D lenses, I find that I get a much lower keeper rate when shooting handheld in low light high ISO situations. Maybe this is to be expected as I'm talking about street shooting but the keeper rate seems significantly lower than my 5D III in the same situation. Again, maybe this is to be expected.
I can't say I've noticed that at all...the IBIS for me has enabled low light shooting I could have only dreamed of before. The OM-D does struggle for focus sometimes in low light, though, and the 75/1.8 seems to hunt more than most on the OM-D in those cases (though it doesn't at all on my GX1, which locks focus so fast and accurately, though it doesn't have IS). If they could put the GX1's AF in the OM-D, I'd pretty much have the perfect camera for me.
Wow. Would not have guessed that. Awesome processing. How does the file look at large magnifications after noise reduction and such? Is it clean enough to make a large print? I haven't done a whole lot of long exposure stuff with my OM-D.
Jman13 wrote:
Wow. Would not have guessed that. Awesome processing. How does the file look at large magnifications after noise reduction and such? Is it clean enough to make a large print? I haven't done a whole lot of long exposure stuff with my OM-D.
