maxxevv wrote:
That's one really outstanding example !!!
Looks impressive, but the shot on the left is suing the ACR defaults, which is sub optimal. I'd like to have a crack at the original and see what other programs I use can do. I'm sure DLO will have the edge if it's doing deconvolution to undo the effects of lens abberations, but I can get that sort of detail from a well focused shot in LR. The DLO may help recover a bit more fine detail but seems to do a great job with lens distortion as shown by wickers shots.
outlawyer wrote:
I only have 3 supported lenses. But one, the 17-40, hopefully can benefit.
here's one with 85L, and I can tell some difference, which is surprising as I have no idea what i'm doing.
I guess Canon adding the Drainpipe is about as likely as me dating Brooklyn Decker....doubt it's considered a "digital lens" but neither could the 50 1.4 be.
ha-ha, so true. Not only do I have the Pipe, but the 35-350L and the 100-300L perform very well and I guess they will never make the list. Bummer
wickerprints wrote:
Top row pair is taken from the lower left of the original image; bottom row pair is taken from the extreme upper right of the original. It should be fairly obvious which column is uncorrected and which is corrected.
it really is a game-changer as it pertains to using Canon lenses and raw processing
IMPRESSIVE. I feel sorry for those who are used to a Lightroom workflow for their Canon RAWs as DLO really could be, like you say, a game-changer.
RobDickinson wrote:
AFIK this does work with sensor data also (AA filter etc)?
5D III certainly, it can supposedly undo the effects of the AA filter. It would be just a matter of Canon doing the measurements and modelling for other cameras to be supported. Did they say 7D would be added soon, as I remember coming across something to that effect early on when they talked about DPP and DLO.
It would take a lot of effort to benchmark each lens and model/measure the PSF for each type of aberration which is then used to do the deconvolution to undo their effect. That the software works so well means they have done some excellent modelling of some nasty PSF's. I'm sure they will continually add to the list over time.
Pixel Perfect wrote:
It would take a lot of effort to benchmark each lens and model/measure the PSF for each type of aberration which is then used to do the deconvolution to undo their effect.
What's your thought: Do you think DLO could make a significant improvement to the 50/1.4 halation?
Ian.Dobinson wrote:
Yeah but the 50/1.4 is still a current lens in the lineup.
I do concur the the pipe won't be added to the list but then when is perfect as it is .........
Yeah, I'm not cryin over it. And you're right, the current lineup is probably the difference...which also probably sadly means that no new 50 1.4 is on the horizon. Foiled again!
I did play some with DLO over the weekend. Both my tele lenses( 400f5.6 and 200f2.8) aren't supported yet. The 100 f2 is also not. But my 17-40 is. I like this feature a lot. will post some shots when i get the time.
I use DPP for my raw workflow so this fits right in.
I don't know if it is possible for them to do it, but if Adobe can build in compatibility for LR and PS to read the DLO corrected RAW files i don't think it would be too much of an interruption in my workflow to run DPP on files first, then edit and catalogue them in LR as per normal.
D. Diggler wrote:
What's your thought: Do you think DLO could make a significant improvement to the 50/1.4 halation?
And will DLO work on purple fringing?
wicker thought it would work for halation, and it should certainly work for CA as I'd would have thought that's a fundamental aberration they'd want to eliminate.
15Bit wrote:
I don't know if it is possible for them to do it, but if Adobe can build in compatibility for LR and PS to read the DLO corrected RAW files i don't think it would be too much of an interruption in my workflow to run DPP on files first, then edit and catalogue them in LR as per normal.
It would be tremendous if it could happen, but Canon would have no interest at all IMO. Maybe they could license the DLO as a plugin for Adobe
but then when is perfect as it is .........