zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
|
rico wrote:
Your analysis is flawed from the start. Of course, the average Joe will take more resolution, everything else being equal. On those occasions when more is bad, I shoot my 1950s-era glass... on film.  Best to think of the 800E as having more noise, not more resolution, not more detail, not more sharpness. The 800E has exactly the same resolution as the 800, but performs no noise reduction (you must do that yourself in post ). Meanwhile, the 800 with AA filter does noise reduction automatically in hardware! This amazing hardware noise reduction works at all apertures, with lenses of any quality, and you get a credit at time of purchase.
...Show more →
Can you elaborate more where is the noise come from? IF you mean frequency more than AA filter can handle, then keep in mind that AA is not free, it also remove detail and clarity of your picture as there is no ideal filter exist. Otherwise, there won't be a D800E exist.
KaaX wrote:
Once again I would recommend people go and read https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/936822/7
It's an excellent discussion of whether AA-less sensors give your actual resolution or spurious resolution. Don't get discouraged by the fact that it seems to be an argument about sharpening at first :-)
It is totally different topic, what I am writing is in real world, there IS AA filter exist either by your lens, Blur hand or diffraction. The discussion in the thread is about you already capture the information, but how you DSP it. Without clean job, you introduce Alias, either purposely or not, then, the discussion became if you want spurious resolution or not because of multistage sharpening. (BTW, I prefer it look sharper, the only reason I haven't done it is because of LAZINESS)
If you ask me why M9 file is more crispy, it is not because of spurious resolution cause from without AA filter but because of NO side effect of AA filter
Thorsten wrote:
Over on Nikongear, Bjorn Rorslett wrote that aliasing will hit worst when shooting very fast lenses (f/1.4 and faster) wide open, though I have no idea about the theory behind it. He posted some examples, too.
Without look that thread, I would say either the resolution of the camera is low or I should congratulate you have an ultra sharp wide open lens and ultra steady hand For real world 3D shooting use wide open, I assume you want ISOLATION, most of your frame are OOF, I doubt moire will bother you.
I think I am very clear on my post, you make trade off and judgement by yourself and pick the one you like, that is it.
It is all about sampling frequency (pixels/sensor size), D800E has highest Nyquist than any AA free camera include all MF so far. I am glad Nikon offer this to its customer based on rational choice. (I am scratching my head of sony NEX 7 choice.)
Again, if 18M m9 is not a big issue, 36M D800E will only be better. Nikon is not idiot, and for such a big company, they certainly know what they are doing and they of course are very conservative for their far higher volume compare to Leica. I see no reason for us Hobbyist or professional who care their IQ most be more conservative than Nikon as a Multimillion company.
Again, Choice is yours. down to Individual. If you clear tell your reason/theory against it, just do it. Don't say it is a fact without any explanation.
Edited on Feb 17, 2012 at 02:05 AM · View previous versions
|
