Over the years, I have had conflicting advice from professional photographers regarding use of IS when a camera is on a tripod. While most say to turn it off, but I have had several people claim they leave theirs on all the time with no problem. Then there is the "have it both ways" school where older IS systems need to be off, but newer ones can be left on.
I was out recently and decided to do a little testing. With a 500 f4 on a Gitzo GT3530LS tripod and Wimberley Sidekick, I tried three different scenarios:
1. Standing out in wind (enough to cause choppy water and some white caps) shooting gulls in the nearby water, hands on the camera
2. Protected on the lee side of building, shooting at a distant building, hands on the camera
3. Same protected location, but with mirror lock up and timer, hands off the camera
In all of these I shot several frames with IS on and off. I could not detect a difference between them at 100% crops.
I don't pretend to think that this is the last word on the issue, but I found it interesting.
It depends on the lens. Some of them don't properly detect a tripod, so you have to turn the IS off. Lenses with the later versions of IS are able to function on a tripod.
Dec 14, 2011 at 01:19 AM
Lars Johnsson Offline • • • • • • • Upload & Sell: Off
According to Canon you can leave the IS on with all the super-tele lenses. With other lenses it depends on what lens it is. Some lenses can have it on, others no.
jstephens62 wrote:
Over the years, I have had conflicting advice from professional photographers regarding use of IS when a camera is on a tripod. While most say to turn it off, but I have had several people claim they leave theirs on all the time with no problem. Then there is the "have it both ways" school where older IS systems need to be off, but newer ones can be left on.
I was out recently and decided to do a little testing. With a 500 f4 on a Gitzo GT3530LS tripod and Wimberley Sidekick, I tried three different scenarios:
1. Standing out in wind (enough to cause choppy water and some white caps) shooting gulls in the nearby water, hands on the camera
2. Protected on the lee side of building, shooting at a distant building, hands on the camera
3. Same protected location, but with mirror lock up and timer, hands off the camera
In all of these I shot several frames with IS on and off. I could not detect a difference between them at 100% crops.
I don't pretend to think that this is the last word on the issue, but I found it interesting.
jstephens62 wrote:
Over the years, I have had conflicting advice from professional photographers regarding use of IS when a camera is on a tripod. While most say to turn it off, but I have had several people claim they leave theirs on all the time with no problem. Then there is the "have it both ways" school where older IS systems need to be off, but newer ones can be left on.
I was out recently and decided to do a little testing. With a 500 f4 on a Gitzo GT3530LS tripod and Wimberley Sidekick, I tried three different scenarios:
1. Standing out in wind (enough to cause choppy water and some white caps) shooting gulls in the nearby water, hands on the camera
2. Protected on the lee side of building, shooting at a distant building, hands on the camera
3. Same protected location, but with mirror lock up and timer, hands off the camera
In all of these I shot several frames with IS on and off. I could not detect a difference between them at 100% crops.
I don't pretend to think that this is the last word on the issue, but I found it interesting.
One reason to turn off IS when on a tripod is to save battery life. Although the drain may be small, when combined with AF, Live View, chimping, etc., the cumulative effect can add up.
bipock wrote:
I never leave it on on a tripod. My 70-200 detects and turns off but my 500 doesn't. With the 500, turning it off makes a huge difference.
Then you may want to have your 500mm checked. Especially, on a long lens like that, even mirror slaping can cause some camera/lens movement that can lead to some blurred images. The IS can help minimizing that and I would leave it on all the time but that's me.
Try this:
500/4 + x2 on the best tripod you can get
Turn off the IS , look through the finder and with you finger tap slightly
On the body while your shooting finger locking the AF on your subject
Now repeat the above with IS ON
I guess from now on you shall leave it ON
In theory on a tripod it makes no difference because the tripod is solid and it is not needed and because if you above 1/1000 etc you should not need it and if you require IS above 1/1000 likely it is not adequate because the sample frequency is too low.
But in practice:
1) I find it helps to frame and find the birds/etc.
2) Wind causes even the best tripod to move, especially big ones. IS helps with this.
3) It does not diminish the focus speed on my 500/F4 that I can notice
4) The battery perfomance may be effected but I carry spare batteries.
5) If I shoot less than 1/1000 it helps which sometimes is necessary
I generally leave IS turned on with my 70-200/2.8L IS II, 28-300L IS, 300/2.8L IS and 500/4L IS, except when doing handheld shooting of fast-moving subjects that require panning in two axes. Such as fast birds flying overhead in close proximity, running/playing dogs, and motorcycle racing on a 'natural' track.
I've more-or-less given up on Mode 2 IS. Basically, it's on or off, for me. Of course, there are situations where Mode 2 is beneficial, I just have to remember that while I'm shooting.
With some of the earlier lenses, you need to switch the IS off when using a tripod. The lack of movement confuses the system and the image starts to jump around the viewfinder. However, using a tripod in high wind or with super telephoto lenses, often results in some camera movement, and the IS system can be invaluable. Later IS models are able to sense the use of a tripod and automatically disable the IS, if necessary.
Of course this is only from Canon; what do they know?
Try this: 500/4 + x2 on the best tripod you can get Turn off the IS , look through the finder and with you finger tap slightly On the body while your shooting finger locking the AF on your subject Now repeat the above with IS ON I guess from now on you shall leave it ON
I agree with this, it really isn't that much about IQ, if the shutter speeds are at that magical number where IS helps you might get some benefit then, otherwise it is all about photographer comfort. Being able to see what you are trying to photograph seems pretty important.
I almost never use a tripod, IS usually takes care of movement. I was tweaking the micro adjust of AF on a tripod recently and had to turn it off on my 300mm f/4 L and 100-400mmL.
With a super tele, even a heavy duty tripod does not stop motion, if I can't use a fast shutter speed, IS works fine. I had a older non IS 600mm L, and huge tripod, big Wimberly Head, perfectly balanced, weight on the underhook, arm over the top to damp out movement, and I still had to keep shutter speeds up around 1/100 and more, there always was some vibration.
I always figured the "turn IS off on a tripod" deal was when shooting longer exposures. Depending on the generation of IS, as well as the lens, IS can cause the image to "float" and an image which would otherwise be sharp since it's on a tripod will be blurry as the IS moves the image during the exposure.
I haven't tested this, but I'd image trying exposures in the neighborhood of 1-5 seconds would show this pretty clearly.
I turn the IS off on my 70-200 f2.8 II when shooting landscape shots on a tripod. One morning I was using live view to compose my shot and the image in live view would not remain steady. I turned IS off and the image in live view remained still. Ever since that morning I just leave IS off when shooting off a tripod which is pretty much all the time.
