 |
Tamron 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF]
|
|
Review Date: Sep 19, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Image quality, sharpness, focus
|
|
Cons:
|
a bit slow focusing at night, build quality
|
|
I have been using this lens since 2007 and I am still happy with the photos. The color, the sharpness, the focus and I love the fact that it has 2.8 aperture.
I use it on most of my commercial shoots and event shoots, as well as 90% of my studio photos.
The only problems I have had with it is that the rubber grip of the zoom came loose two years ago, but I fixed it with superglue (it might have been because of too much moisture, I was camping on the sea shore for some 10 days at the time).
Overall, it is a very good lens for its price, I highly recommend it!
All the best and happy shooting,
Sandra
https://www.facebook.com/sandrarugina
http://sandrarugina.eu/
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Nov 6, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharpness, solid build, IS works very well
|
|
Cons:
|
quite heavy and pricey. Very big especially with hood on
|
|
It is probably one of the best pro lenses out there. It is heavy but also perfectly sharp and the IS works very well.
I have to say it looks kinda scary with the hood on, but luckily you don't have to get so close to the subject with such a lens.
I strongly recommend it to those photographers who earn their living out of taking photos.
Cheers!
sandra
http://sandrarugina.eu/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
