Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM
|
|
Review Date: Jun 13, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Built, bokeh, f/1.2, sharp, color quality
|
|
Cons:
|
Weight, sometimes I experienced shift focus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pancake
|
|
Review Date: Jun 13, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Light, good image quality and color, sharp
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
I use this on my 5d3 every week to take pictures of my kids. I love it because its very light as if I don't have any lens on my camera. The background is not as good as 50/f1.2 but for the price this is pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 29, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
IS, fast auto focus, nice bokeh, sharp
|
|
Cons:
|
the hood is too long, heavy compare with sigma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 27, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp, light weight compare with 70-200 f/2.8 IS, small, IS
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 27, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp, fast, light weight, nice colors and bokeh and affordable
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
I have this lens for a while and I love it. I always use this lens for outdoor portraiture and I always shoot at f/1.8. The lens is sharp and has a nice color.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 6, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
small, inexpensive, sharp, and light weight
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
Great lens for the price.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 6, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $900.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp lens, lighter than 24-70, IS, great walk around lens esp on FF,
|
|
Cons:
|
Not wide enough for crop body, Vignette 24 - 28mm
|
|
|
I have this lens since 2008 and I love it. I use this all the time especially if I go on vacation/hiking.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 6, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $623.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
good value L lens, nice price, best wide angle for landscape
|
|
Cons:
|
no IS
|
|
Canon 17-40 is a good lens for landscape photography. Its a great value L lens too. I own this lens since November 2007 and I love it. I took most pictures using this lens and the quality is good as the 24-105. 
Here's some samples using the 17-40:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/codeblue1/4747265257/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/codeblue1/4742769376/
|
|
|
|
|
