Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 4, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,100.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Very useful zoom range and fast glass.
|
|
Cons:
|
Weighs a ton. Seems to be more fragile than my other L lens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 4, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $900.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Built like a tank. Awesome quite focus.
|
|
Cons:
|
None that you can really complain about with a super wide angle lens. Lightroom fixes most issues.
|
|
|
Having 2.8 helps a lot in low light. This is my main commercial lens for buildings. Awesome lens and can be had for around $900 used.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 4, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $325.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Price. The quality is amazing for a lens you can get for $300-350.
|
|
Cons:
|
Not great at focusing in low light, but way better than the 1.8
|
|
|
Unless you make a lot of money doing photography I would recommend this over the 1.2 just do to the fact that it's only $300-350.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8
|
|
Review Date: Oct 4, 2013
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 7
|
|
Pros:
|
It's cheap.
|
|
Cons:
|
This lens is loud and made of plastic. It's horrible at finding focus especially if you're not outside under the sun. You can't put a quick detach lens shade on it. You have to use a screw in one.
|
|
|
Save your money for the 1.4 it's way better!
|
|
|
|
|
