Canon Extender EF 1.4X III
|
|
Review Date: Jul 11, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $474.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
70-200 2.8 II with this converter is still bright, incredibly sharp, and not much heavier ;->
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
Note: gave high price rating because of how much I save by not buying another lens.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon Extender EF 2x III
|
|
Review Date: Feb 22, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $474.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Very sharp with the new 70-200 2.8L IS II (as sharp as my previous 70-200 2.8L IS was without the tele-converter). Good performance even when pointed sunward with high contrast scenery.
|
|
Cons:
|
not stackable with 1.4 (or another 2x)
|
|
|
Price rating high mostly because I save a lot by not needing the 100-400 zoom (and the extra weight).
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
|
|
Review Date: Jan 4, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,300.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Contrasty, good in low light. Sharp to edges, even at 16mm f2.8 (although beginning to soften a bit in corners)
|
|
Cons:
|
different size filters and lens cap than other L lenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
