Gitzo 2220 Aluminum Explorer
|
|
Review Date: Jan 23, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
I would like to start a gitzo monopod review site! I just bought a GM5541 carbon fiber monopod rated to hold 55 lbs with a Canon EOS EF 400 2.8L IS
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Jan 3, 2010
|
Recommend? |
Price paid: $7,500.00
|
|
Pros:
|
I have owned this lens for over 3 years and have to admit it's the sharpest 400 mm lens wide open at 2.8. I consider this lens #1 with the Canon 85 1.2 Mark II following short behind.
|
|
Cons:
|
no cons
|
|
|
Hands down the best supertelephoto lens out there!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM
|
|
Review Date: Apr 15, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 1
|
|
Pros:
|
well it's slow,built bad,the hood falls off!!! arghhhh!!!!
|
|
Cons:
|
it's white light and full of might
|
|
|
Yes I've had this piece of madness for little over a year. It's too slow for most photograhy
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 28-70mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 17, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
THIS LENS IS VERY SHARP
|
|
Cons:
|
IT IS NOT SO SHARP WIDE OPEN TO 2.8
|
|
|
i DO ALOT OF PORTRAITS FOR SOCCER And well it fits well on my ID mark II and EOS 1N's
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 10, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $4,500.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Well I like the color white already I think it's cute as a button.
|
|
Cons:
|
well technically speaking 300mm is not that long of a lens if you do sports like myself for a living, I would recommend the canon 400 2.8 L IS And for yoursake and the sake of all the photographers on this website don't waste your money on a third party 30mm lens. Thats all I have to say and oh yeah Hail Hail Canon for the 400 2.8 IS
|
|
|
I own the non IS version and it is as sharp as a tack. it is too heavy to hand hold it very long,it's good for college football,swimming indoors,football,soccer good with teleconverters.
I would recomend this lens to anybody wanting to step up to a supertelephoto.Also if you can find a non IS version in good shape,I've heard the original 300 is just as sharp as his IS version. And as far as IS goes,I currently own the 400 2.8 IS L version and it is "annoying" and slows the autofocus down.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 1D Mark II
|
|
Review Date: Feb 2, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $3,900.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
it can do all plus more of what a film camera can do
|
|
Cons:
|
there's no buy one get one free offer
|
|
|
I mean this camera has it all,well for a digital it makes my critique
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Oct 15, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $7,000.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
the reach,the feel on your hands
|
|
Cons:
|
I hAVE NOTHING NEGATIVE TO SAY about the lens
|
|
|
Great lens, great for soccer with a 1.4 x converter. Just a great all around lens. The weight doesn't bother me.
|
|
|
|
|
