 |
Tamron 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF]
|
|
Review Date: Jun 3, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $419.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp, fast focus, not noisy, size and weight, I love this lens
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
on my Nikon D200 the lens focus quickly and quietly for and for a none Silent Wave, hard to discern the differences compared to a SW lens.
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon D200
|
|
Review Date: May 13, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,700.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
size and weight, features, image quality, solid sealed built, built in flash, simple to use i.e well designed buttons for critical features.
|
|
Cons:
|
none for me, for high ISO users a bit noisy.
|
|
|
I just love this camera! for the first time ever for me: when I exhibit large prints i.e 10x14 I am often asked if I took the image in medium format!
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon 12-24mm f/4G ED-IF AF-S DX
|
|
Review Date: May 13, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $935.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
optics, size and weight, zoom range covers allneeded w/a.
|
|
Cons:
|
pricy a bit plasticy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon 18-70 f/3.5-4.5G AFS DX
|
|
Review Date: May 24, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $290.00
| Rating: 7
|
|
Pros:
|
Light, good range, decent built, quick and silent focus, good price.
|
|
Cons:
|
soft on wider end
|
|
|
I bought this lens to go on my D100 for a light weight DSLR and lens for hiking and backpacking. I would not buy this lens if it were not for these requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR
|
|
Review Date: May 19, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $510.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
sharpness, size and weight, VR
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
Have read several bad reviews about the lens being soft. Bought it anyway "needing a walking around lens." It is perfect for this purpose, at f8 or f11 it is tack sharp, do not know what the fuss is about re softness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
