Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8
|
|
Review Date: Aug 29, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
'Very' sharp and wonderfull lens! (Waw). TS of course! Construction is super.
|
|
Cons:
|
Some flair in backlight. Cheap and strange looking lenshood.
|
|
|
As sharp as my 135mm f2! (My favourith lens). Better than 70-200 L IS USM at 90mm! Great for table top. Gives photography another dimension. A lens I keep in my bag. Thinking about bying the 24 mm as wel.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM
|
|
Review Date: Jan 7, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Together with my 135mm F2 L USM and 300mm F2,8 L USM the best lens i have. Incredibly sharp! As scharp as some Leica lenses i have. A keeper. Much better on 35mm then my zoom 17-40mm F4 L USM! Great lens in low light! Use it on my 5D now:) Waw! If you have the money for it, well then buy it very soon.
|
|
Cons:
|
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tokina 17mm f/3.5 AT-X 17 AF PRO
|
|
Review Date: Dec 31, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Very well build. Feels like a good lens and it actually is. I use it on Canon 5D. Needs to stop down untill at least f5,6 - f8! Better then my Canon 17-40mm f4 L USM at 17mm! Almost no distortion. AF is ok. Not like my Canon L lenses of course. But i never use AF with such wide angle lenses. With f8 you have a depth of field from 0,5m untill unending! For its price a super lens!
|
|
Cons:
|
Lens flare! Maybe because of lens hood? My Canon 16-35 f2,8 L USM had the same problem at 16mm. I sould it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 50mm f2.8 EX Macro 1:1 Lens
|
|
Review Date: Apr 7, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Nicely build, cheap and razer sharp between f5,6 & f16.
|
|
Cons:
|
Non.
|
|
|
The first lens from Sigma i ever bought! (Was a bit afraid actually). I am using Canon and Leica glass. Owned the Canon macro EF 100mm f2,8 USM. (I sold it because macro is not really my thing and i have lots off other Canon glass). I own Leica elmarit macro 60mm f2,8 wich i use on my Canon digital body's with adapter from Novoflex. (Not any more)! My Leica glass is not giving me better pictures then this Sigma. I really was suprised with the quality of this lightweight. Don't be afraid to buy it! Very nice lens!
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Jan 12, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Razer sharp! Build for life.
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
Together with 135mm f2 'the' lens! Even with extender 2X. As good as some of my Leica lenses! And believe me... that means something! By the way, i always use monopod with this one. It is rather heavy, so 'IS' is not that important for me.
|
|
|
|
|
