Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 24, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp! Great colors and bokeh
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
This is a fantastic lens. I found it to be a little long for indoor work, but outdoors it performed like a champ.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L USM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 27, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Brokeh is great, low light capabilities, sharp
|
|
Cons:
|
A little slow to focus
|
|
|
This is a great lens if you find yourself needing the extra edge in low light conditions. The brokeh is fabulous and alows for very creative DOF. It a great lens that I really should use more.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 27, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $3,400.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
fast Focus, Super sharp, focus persets and focus stop buttons
|
|
Cons:
|
A little pricey
|
|
|
This is a must have lens if it fits your budget. The focus is fast and locks acuately. Definately one of the sharpest lenes that I have ever had. Works well with extenders for the extra added reach. with a little effort it's definately hand holdable, in my opinion not much less than the 70-200. Check on out if you get a chance and you will fall in love.
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma 150mm f2.8 APO Macro DG EX HSM
|
|
Review Date: Dec 7, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $490.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality, color, contrast, sharpness
|
|
Cons:
|
None so far.
|
|
|
This is the first non Canon lens that I have used and first non "L" lens I've used in a really long time with the exception of my Canon 100mm macro which I just sold. I must say that according to my preliminary tests on this lens and compared to all my other "L" glass this lens is the sharpest piece I own. For the price I am glad I decided to give it a try. The working distance is just what I was looking for and the image quality surpassed expectations.
|
|
|
|
|
