Canon EOS 5D Mark III
|
|
Review Date: Jul 6, 2015
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Great performance. More reliable auto focus, build quality, excellent high ISO performance, picture quality and sharpness. A better and clearer viewfinder.
|
|
Cons:
|
Grip is a little too big for my hand. Too high price for a new camera
|
|
|
I finaly bought one with low shutter Counts and i perfect condition. First I could not see much difference from the mark II. But after I while I noticed the difference in the performance.
I still think the Price of a new one is too high. I payed 1500US which is fair for a used one.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 24, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Super. Doesnīt let you down unless you are faster than the IS at slow shuttersspeeds. Sharp and crisp
|
|
Cons:
|
None so far.
|
|
|
Very handy on my 7D. Good for travel. Sharp and crisp.
Takes a little practice to understand the IS.
I never had lenses with IS.
Recomend this lens
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
|
|
Review Date: Jul 15, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Very sharp. Good autofocus. Light compared to the 2.8 version
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
I just like this lens. I had the 2.8 version, which also was very good. But for me a bit too heavy
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
|
|
Review Date: Jun 21, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Right on every time. Wish all lenses were as goo as this.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
Everytime I use this lens I am surprised how good it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM
|
|
Review Date: May 12, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Sometimes very sharp
|
|
Cons:
|
Sometimes not so sharp.
|
|
|
This lens still surprises me. Sometimes it is very sharp, but sometimes I am not satisfied with the images it produces.
Good for trekking, when weight is an issue. But remember fast shutterspeed, tripod or enough light.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
Review Date: Aug 31, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Performs excellent. Never question the image quality
|
|
Cons:
|
Very heavy for travel
|
|
|
I have had the lens for 4 years. Always been satisfied with the autofocus and image quality.
I find it a little bit too heavy for travelling, so it sometimes stay home.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 10D
|
|
Review Date: Mar 26, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality. Excellent imeage quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow startup. Small lcd.
|
|
|
I have had the camera since it was released.
It took me a long time to discovers all its abilities.
Not always satisfied with the quality of the images. Sometimes it needs at lot of postprocessing.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 1D
|
|
Review Date: Jul 21, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality. Ergonomics. Fast startup, writing and shooting
|
|
Cons:
|
Short battery life. Not so good high ISO value
|
|
|
I think I was lucky to get the camera so cheap.
To me the EOS 1D lies perfect in my hand. I can easyli hold it still compared to my EOS 10D. The interface is quiet similar to the Canon T90 which i allways wanted to be digital.
I now donīt want to go back to the EOS 10D, but perhaps I have to because of the low batterycapacity and the not so good high IS0 performance. I look forward to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
