 |
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 13, 2018
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,450.00
|
|
Pros:
|
High-speed, Megacutting, Ideal for portraits, Macro, Quality L series
Fix (I consider this a plus)
|
|
Cons:
|
stabilizer noise
|
|
|
This is one lump of a lens, I could not make my mind up between this lens and the L version, but the extra expense just for IS just ain't worth it, you can use it by hand if you can hold it steady, but most of the time it will be on a tripod.
It does produce fantastic pictures, I would not now be with out it.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS
|
|
Review Date: Feb 13, 2018
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $600.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharpness, weight, compact size, picture, bokeh, tenacity of focus, speed of focusing, image stabilization in poor conditions, color rendition.
|
|
Cons:
|
No
|
|
|
I bought this lense for low light. Mainly on people's birthdays, for when the candles are getting blown out. cheaper than the L1.4, which I tested. This lense is very good quality and I would highly recommend it.
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
|
|
Review Date: Feb 13, 2018
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $300.00
| Rating: 7
|
|
Pros:
|
Night time, Portraits/Families/People
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
Cheap, small, good in low light. In another 10 years improved sensor tech will allow f 3 or higher lenses to be used in low light, till then cheap fast lenses are MUST BUYS, well done Canon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
