 |
Page: 1 · 2
|
|
|
|
mark1958
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Jan 27, 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 9056
|
|
Review Date: Apr 2, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,350.00
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Very wide ---
sturdy build
|
|
Cons:
|
Some CA
sharpness lacking on the edges
|
|
|
I think if you need a really wide angle lens this would be it. However, I found the 16-35 to be equally as sharp and the colors and contrast to be very similar at 16mm. The trade offs are the zoom vs extra 2mm. For me the zoom was much more valuable. I suspect if i was shooting interiors often I would have kept this lens but in the end, I sold it.
|
|
 Apr 2, 2003
|
|
John MacLean
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 11, 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 420
|
|
Review Date: Mar 29, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $2,050.00
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
angle of view
|
|
Cons:
|
CA, soft edges, flares easy
|
|
|
If you need the W I D E view, this is Canon's best effort to date. Otherwise I'd suggest the 16-35. The price has dropped since I got mine 3 years ago.
|
|
|
Mar 29, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
18
|
155802
|
Dec 21, 2016
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
83% of reviewers
|
$1,571.43
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
9.43
|
6.79
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
