 |
Page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7
|
|
|
|
antonyyip Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Dec 7, 2005 Location: China Posts: 0
|
Review Date: Oct 23, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $840.00
| Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, as light as old non-IS version, well built (including the hood), 4-stop IS, slient and fast USM
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
I owned non-IS 100 marco before buying this lens. The difference I have to pay for this lens is around $440. But what extra I can get includes "L" lens optical quality (sharp!), new hybrid IS fuction, more slient and faster auto focus, and better build of lens and hood.
|
|
Oct 23, 2009
|
|
Mr.Jsph Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 22, 2009 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 0
|
Review Date: Oct 23, 2009
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 5
|
Pros:
|
sealed.
|
Cons:
|
Size of filters, no tripod ring, AF doesn't works perfect, IS is not usable with insects in movement, you need a tripod, no buld as others L series lens, cromatic aberrations.
|
|
|
|
Oct 23, 2009
|
|
Deniss Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 22, 2009 Location: United States Posts: 0
|
Review Date: Oct 22, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,020.00
| Rating: 6
|
Pros:
|
L series, weatherproofing.
|
Cons:
|
Plastic, no tripod ring, IS not operative in movement situations, Cromatic Aberrations perceptible much as earlier 100mm. Not so excellent as I was expecting
|
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2009
|
|
anorphirith Offline

Registered: Apr 13, 2008 Location: United States Posts: 1153
|
Review Date: Oct 22, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,050.00
| Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Excellent build quality, Hybrid IS very effective, bokeh is just fantastic, razor sharp, lightweight, very silent focus and IS
|
Cons:
|
a little pricey, limited for insects but perfect for flowers, it is not possible to
remove the lens cap while the hood is on
|
|
My first Macro lens, I always wanted to option to shoot close, and I learned that this lens can be used for many more purposes, portraits indoor/low light shots, the hybrid IS is a BIG difference from the regular IS
the image couldn't be sharper
very good lens, I recommend it to anyone as a 100mm lens AND a s a macro lens
|
|
Oct 22, 2009
|
|
jojomon11 Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Sep 6, 2008 Location: United States Posts: 7625
|
Review Date: Oct 22, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,049.00
| Rating: 9
|
Pros:
|
Light, fast-focus, IS, High quality plastic, Quiet
|
Cons:
|
Price, No tripod ring
|
|
Good performer, in terms of IQ the very same as the 100 2.8 version. Handhold ability is very good in good lighting. Build quality although mostly a plastic body, the feel and quality is very good. A light weight lens with excellent results. This is a great lens for people who don't use a tripod, although it can be used with a tripod like I use also.
|
|
Oct 22, 2009
|
|
B Culbertson Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 6, 2007 Location: United States Posts: 17
|
Review Date: Oct 21, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,049.00
| Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, faster focus than earlier model, Excellent Image Stabilization, f/2.8
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
I have used both the second generation Canon 100mm macro (non-IS) and the Canon 180mm macro. This lens is a great performer. The only thing I miss is the reach of the 180 when shooting insects. But the new generation IS significantly helps with handheld macro and makes this a great lens for close portrait. It is clearly sharper than my 70-200 f/2.8 IS and focuses almost as fast (when you use the focus limiter to remove macro focus). It is also quite light (very similar to the 100mm non-IS) but well built. I realize that it is pricey but the ability to use the lens for more than macro sealed the deal for me.
|
|
Oct 21, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
102
|
185397
|
Oct 28, 2019
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
96% of reviewers
|
$949.58
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
9.34
|
8.76
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |