 |
Page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8
|
|
|
|
Tom Piotrowski Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Sep 10, 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 74
|
Review Date: Jul 13, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $3,900.00
| Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Unbelivably sharp and colour crisp lens. Undoubtedly the "flagship" lens in photographer's collection.
|
Cons:
|
Hood and "leather hosen" lens cap are off shaped and not very practical in use
|
|
After shooting with a range of Canon L zoom lenses, the time came for me to invest in "primes". The 300 f/2.8L IS USM offers rock solid canon build and incredible glass quality. This is by far one of the sharpest Canon lenses ever bilt, even used wide open at f/2.8.
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/37273/0#309307
|
|
Jul 13, 2003
|
|
Chris Anderson Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Dec 23, 2002 Location: United States Posts: 844
|
Review Date: May 4, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $3,899.00
| Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
What can I say, its my favorite lens!!
|
Cons:
|
Nothing yet!
|
|
|
|
May 4, 2003
|
|
Ben Horne Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Jan 9, 2002 Location: United States Posts: 12207
|
Review Date: Mar 30, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $3,100.00
| Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, Fast, Solid
|
Cons:
|
Mounting collar could move smoother
|
|
Of all the lenses I own, the 300mm f/2.8 is likely my favorite. It's very fast, sharp, and light enough to hand hold (though I would not want to do so for an extended period of time). It works very well with the 1.4x converter (420mm f/4) and works ok with the 2x converter (600mm f/5.6) so long as the subject is very large in the frame.
This lens is very sharp through the aperture range, though I do notice a slight drop in contrast wide open. The amazing thing is that the loss of contrast clears up with 1/3 of a stop! At f/3.2, it has nearly the same sharpness as at f/8. When using teleconverters, I would recommend stopping down 2/3 to 1 full stop for maximum sharpness.
This is a great lens for both outdoor and indoor sports. I use it to shoot basketball and tennis without any teleconverters, and I add the 1.4x or the 2x for baseball.
With regard to the size --- it's a big lens, but it's not huge by any means. When the hood is removed or reversed, it will fit in just about any reasonable camera bag.
I highly recommend this lens --- if you are shooting sports, this is a must-have lens.
lens.
|
|
Mar 30, 2003
|
|
GrizzlyMike Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Sep 23, 2002 Location: United States Posts: 403
|
Review Date: Mar 29, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $3,950.00
| Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Sharpnesss, Beautiful color rendition and contrast
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
The sharpest lens in Canons lineup?(or the 200 1.8 perhaps?). Very very sharp. With a digital camera that has a 1.4x FOV and combined with the use of the 1.4x and 2x extenders this lens is all you will really need for wildlife work(accept for birders perhaps).
The contrast and color rendition is superb and wide open this lens produces very smooth and finely textured backrgound blur(bokeh I guess its called).It is expensive but worth every penny.
|
|
Mar 29, 2003
|
|
rebel300 Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Dec 30, 2001 Location: United States Posts: 13834
|
Review Date: Mar 29, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $3,990.00
| Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Super sharp
|
Cons:
|
DOF difficult to manage
|
|
Beautiful color and exceptional detail. You can use the 1.4 TC with it and the detail loss is minimal. Incredible background blur can be achieved with this lens. All in all a superior lens. A monopod is advised as it is heavy.
I rate this lens at 4.7 on a 5 scale
LM
|
|
Mar 29, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
117
|
280858
|
Dec 28, 2016
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
97% of reviewers
|
$3,740.57
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
9.93
|
9.16
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |