 |
|
|
peterstrong
Offline
[ X ]
Registered: Dec 21, 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Dec 21, 2016
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp at f/2.8, not a strong fish eye effect relatively mild even on FF. Well built but small enough to take everywhere.
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
I carry lens with me wherever I go because it is so much fun to shoot and never fails to produces the most remarkable images. I've not owned any other fisheye lenses so I can't compare it quality wise with anything. All I know is the images this lens produces consistently puts a smile on my face. I own a lot of lenses so it is quite unique in that regard.
|
|
 Dec 21, 2016
|
|
Robin Smith
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Dec 19, 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1416
|
|
Review Date: May 14, 2015
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Good image quality. Light and compact
|
|
Cons:
|
No USM. Lens cap a bit loose.
|
|
|
Excellent image quality even at f2.8 - may need a tweek in sharpness or clarity on LR to match your other 35-50mm primes, but very good for a fisheye. AF is right on too. This is a better lens than the Sigma 15mm, which is pretty good itself. Sharper across the image area at full aperture and better AF. The Sigma has very unreliable AF (unfortunately a common trait with Sigma), and I used to resort to Live View focusing with that one - not a big deal with a fisheye of course due to the great depth of field, but it is very nice to have the quick AF with the Canon.
The AF is old and not USM - but who cares really? The large cap tends to fall off. The Sigma cap is much better. Thoroughly recommend this lens if you like full frame fisheyes, and much, much better value than the current Canon 8-15mm zoom.
|
|
|
May 14, 2015
|
|
Soulphoto2014
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 3, 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Sep 3, 2014
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: $650.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Compact, fair price, lightweigh, sharp, built in metal lenshood
|
|
Cons:
|
out of production
|
|
|
Compact little fisheye out of production, it's good but the Sigma 15 2.8 is better, I had them both and used them for partyphotography (in fact the only lens I used for this).
It's a good lens but if you can still chose, go for the Sigma 15 2.8.
|
|
|
Sep 3, 2014
|
|
JesseShotland
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 17, 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 345
|
|
Review Date: Jul 17, 2014
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp wide open, lightweight, built in metal lens hood, great solid metal construction.
|
|
Cons:
|
loud autofocus, manual focus ring feels like a toy
|
|
|
If there was a lens that did, this is the lens that deserves a red ring.
|
|
|
Jul 17, 2014
|
|
svassh
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 4, 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 1072
|
|
Review Date: Dec 8, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $525.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp at f/2.8, not a strong fish eye effect relatively mild even on FF. Well built but small enough to take everywhere.
|
|
Cons:
|
Focus a little noisy and no USM
|
|
|
Purchased this used as no longer made. Really impressed with how sharp it is wide open and the MFD is great when you want to accentuate the fish eye effect.
|
|
|
Dec 8, 2012
|
|
Gunzorro
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Aug 27, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 14591
|
|
Review Date: Sep 26, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $500.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Amazing color and sharpness. Surprisingly low flare, and ghosts look good.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
I bought the lens used in excellent condition. So sorry this isn't being made anymore. Incredible quality of imaging and construction -- deserves an "L" and red ring. Special use, but worth owning.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2012
|
|
michi098
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 20, 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 30
|
|
Review Date: Jun 18, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
|
I bought this lens refurbished directly from Canon. What a wonderful lens. Compared to all the other L lenses, this lens is actually small. The lens cap is of a odd design, it would have been nice if it locked in place somehow, but it does the job.
The focus motor is on the louder side, but then again, the distance it has to travel is so minute that it really doesn't matter, it only "buzzes" for a fraction of a second until something is in focus again.
Build quality is good, nothing to brag about, but not like a cheap kit lens either. It should be fine unless you plan on abusing it.
Picture quality is really impressive. Even wide open, my copy is surprisingly sharp in the corners. Not, not as sharp as the center of course, but perfectly usable. Stopping down, and it's pretty amazing.
Wide open, you get some pretty strong red chromatic aberrations in the corners. I find them to be easily correctable with software though.
They do call it a fish eye, although I find it to be more of a hybrid between fish eye and ultra wide angle lens. The lines do curve strongly, but not ridiculously. I have played with correcting the lines, and nearly always find the original results more natural and pleasing to the eye than corrected ones with straight lines.
When I went to full frame, I really missed my Canon 10-22, but this lens makes up for that. I really enjoy this lens. If you can find a used or refurbished one, I recommend giving it a try. Compared to the prices of lenses Canon is selling now, this lens is a steal.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2012
|
|
nswelton
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 16, 2006
Location: N/A
Posts: 282
|
|
Review Date: Apr 11, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
small minimum focus distance, sharp, relatively fast to focus
|
|
Cons:
|
could be built a little sturdier. kinda spendy for what you get.
|
|
|
having used the canon, nikon and sigma variations of the non zooming fisheye i'd say this is the best of the bunch. really shape and the small minimum focusing distance allows you to really milk the fisheye effect for all it's worth.
|
|
|
Apr 11, 2012
|
|
dimsonation
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 30, 2010
Location: Israel
Posts: 7
|
|
Review Date: Mar 14, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp across the frame
|
|
Cons:
|
lens cap, no USM
|
|
|
not my most used lens but definitely a fun one when i DO need it. considering it's age, it provides excellent results even on today's demanding FF bodies. my copy is VERY sharp across the frame from f/5.6 to f/11
it's a real shame canon stopped making it, rather than introducing an updated version with USM
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2012
|
|
NDP_2010
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 7, 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 724
|
|
Review Date: Mar 13, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $550.00
|
|
Pros:
|
small, light, quite sharp at 2.8 in the centre, fairly solid build
|
|
Cons:
|
no USM.
|
|
|
Creates very interesting fisheye photos.
The lens is sharp and the auto focus seems sufficient for this ultra wide lens. However an ultrasonic focus would be nice for action pictures.
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2011
|
|
jcmedeiros
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Jun 30, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 864
|
|
Review Date: Dec 28, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $510.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Fun to shoot
|
|
Cons:
|
Front lens cap restraint design
|
|
|
I carry lens with me wherever I go because it is so much fun to shoot and never fails to produces the most remarkable images. I've not owned any other fisheye lenses so I can't compare it quality wise with anything. All I know is the images this lens produces consistently puts a smile on my face. I own a lot of lenses so it is quite unique in that regard.
My only negative comment is the front lens cap which is restrained only by friction (felt lined cap). I always have the feeling this cap is going to fall off leaving the front element exposed. Other than this little nit, I am very pleased with the construction of this lens.
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2010
|
|
Todd Klassy
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 27, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 290
|
|
Review Date: Oct 25, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $600.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Very sharp, rectilinear focal length, small size, does the job very well on cameras with a full frame.
|
|
Cons:
|
No USM, nosier focus, lens cap, no full-time manual focusing, colors a tad muted than other Canon lenses I own.
|
|
The Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye lens is a bit of a boutique lens, but can come in very handy in certain circumstances if you own a camera with a full-frame sensor. If your camera(s) has/have a APS-C or APS-H sized sensor, this probably isn't the lens for you.
This is a rectilinear lens, which means the geometry of straight objects, such as walls or the sides of buildings, will appear less curved despite the extremely wide focal length of this lens. The lens, however, still maintains a fisheye 'look' as objects will appear increasingly stretched and enlarged the closer they are to the edge of the frame.
Overall this is a good lens. Build quality is good, images are sharp, and it is very lightweight. It could, however, use some updating, as it does not have USM focusing (it is somewhat noisier than all other lenses I own when it focuses), its lens cap is an annoying design, it has no full-time manual focusing, and colors are a tad muted. But since it is a boutique lens and is only on my camera in specific situations these shortcomings are not all that annoying in the grand scheme of things.
Here are some photographs I have taken with the Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye lens:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/latitudes/2058114898/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/latitudes/274509497/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/latitudes/3833097929/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/latitudes/1664079216/
|
|
|
Oct 25, 2010
|
|
LucianoMenardo
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 7, 2010
Location: Argentina
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Oct 7, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $650.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Ultra wide. Fast. Sharp. Funny style.
|
|
Cons:
|
No filter (painy scratchs danger everytime). Noisy like a rat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2010
|
|
Jos Tesseract
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 28, 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 615
|
|
Review Date: Sep 15, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
fun! wide! fast AF, crystal sharp, amazing colour
|
|
Cons:
|
fogs over easily, fixed petal, lens cap, no filters
|
|
|
What can I say... this lens rocks. I rented it for a weekend music festival where colour was abundant and this lens captured every little streak of it. In texture shots, it still performed very well and rendered pleasing shots.
The colour saturation was mind blowing for me. Never before had I captured such intense colours from other lenses so completely. Many fall short in one or two areas of the spectrum - not this one. Reds were vibrant, Blues were strong, Yellows were punchy and everything in between was excellent.
My only real complaint about this lens is that if can be difficult to frame the shot properly, knowing that things are going to find their way into the pic that you don't want... like a dirty dancefloor.
|
|
|
Sep 15, 2010
|
|
iomega
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 11, 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Jul 4, 2010
|
Recommend? |
Price paid: Not Indicated
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp, sharp, sharp, sharp.
|
|
Cons:
|
barrel, barrel, barrel, barrel. Not so wide with x1.6 cameras. Can't use filters. Old design.
|
|
|
I use it exclusively with canon 5D. At F8 you cannot get any better sharpness with other lens. Period. Even nikkor legends are far from this one. VERY FAR! the close focus helps a lot with creative subjects. use DxO software for barrel correction and you get better results than the 8 times more expensive 14mm L lens. This one looks like a russian lens because of it's outdated inbond hood and it cannot be removed. Don't clean the front element, it looks too sensible and thin.
|
|
|
Jul 4, 2010
|
|
mmari
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 20, 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 21
|
|
Review Date: Jan 30, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
very sharp wide open, only slight improvement when stopped down. nice built quality even though its an L. fast & accurate AF even though its not USM.
|
|
Cons:
|
front lens cap always & easily detaching by itself. no AF manual overdrive, its more like a clutch type but in switch form. cant use filters. abit noisy AF but its fine with me.
|
|
|
i really loved this lens from the day i bought it. its my new walkabout lens.
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
72
|
208010
|
Dec 21, 2016
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
92% of reviewers
|
$563.00
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
8.56
|
8.26
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
