ChrisDM wrote:
shrink1, thank for posting this image. I\'ve been curious to see some 12800 shots from the 5D2. Please disregard the very few members here that strangely don\'t have the common sense enough to realize you posted this shot so that we can simply see what the camera can do at 12800. Of course our creator didn\'t bless us all with common sense of course! How boring these forums would be
Thanks again,
Chris Miller
www.imagineimagery.com
I\'ve got plenty of common sense, including the common sense to understand that the word \"sample\" does not necessarily imply \"high ISO test image not taken for any other purpose\", especially as the OP asks for feedback about whether an image of his family is ruined at the same time. In the future, if you\'re going to merely attack someone, have the tact and good sense to keep your yap shut. Your creator did endow you with that, didn\'t he?
ChrisDM wrote:
shrink1, thank for posting this image. I\'ve been curious to see some 12800 shots from the 5D2. Please disregard the very few members here that strangely don\'t have the common sense enough to realize you posted this shot so that we can simply see what the camera can do at 12800. Of course our creator didn\'t bless us all with common sense of course! How boring these forums would be
Thanks again,
Chris Miller
www.imagineimagery.com
I\'ve got plenty of common sense, including the common sense to understand that the word \"sample\" does not necessarily imply \"test image\", especially as the OP asks for feedback about whether an image is ruined at the same time. In the future, if you\'re going to merely attack someone, have the tact and good sense to keep your yap shut. Your creator did endow you with that, didn\'t he?
Dec 14, 2008 at 07:19 PM
Previous versions of jvarszegi's message #6486264 « 5DII high ISO sample »
