What I would like to know is how did she treat him as she was doing this? Did she tell him how much she disliked him as she shot? Did she explain how different lighting and different angles can have a drastic affect on how a picture comes out, and how low lit angles can make you look sinister? Did she argue with him on political issues? I doubt we will ever know, but one thing I am pretty sure of, she probably did not tell him she was taking shots for herself and would use them against him, because she is just too gutless to do that. She hid behind her contract with the magazine, just like she hides behind her art. Would she be willing to face him and argue point on point? Somehow I doubt it.
Quite honestly, this says nothing about her politics. I have known many wonderful and sincere people on both sides of the political fence. This is about individual honesty, integrity and self respect, of which she obviously has very little. It\'s her loss.
Charlie
Chas
Sep 15, 2008 at 07:12 PM
Previous versions of chas's message #6171187 « A photographer shows no ethics »
