Ross Martin
Online
Upload & Sell: On
|
 Re: The f/1.2 "Look" | |
This is a fun poll :-)
For me it’s helpful to separate the facts of physics, from opinions. So we know from the science that f/1.2 gathers more light, and allows for more shallow depth of field, compared to F/1.4 or any slower aperture. Same as with other lenses, such as a 300/2.8 vs. f/4 or slower options that exits in some brands lineups.
Now subjectively, these factual differences may, or may not matter to an individual. People do get excited over the subtleties of different pieces of gear, and often hype one over another, thus forums and YouTube exist :-)
Personally, I get a lot of inspiration out of shooting my 50/1.2 GM especially when photographing my nephews and nieces (mine is a superb copy that was one of the many that went through smpetty’s hands and tested great by him, thanks!) and have no interest in the f/1.4 version. But many others value the 1.4’s smaller size, lighter weight, and lower price. It’s nice to have choices.
Edit: my first f/1.2 lens was purchased back in college when I was in the photojournalism program, nearly 40 years ago now, so it has specialness to me that goes beyond facts and logic.
|
