curious80
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
|
 Re: Fuji trash talk'n | |
mahimihi wrote:
@gdanmitchell@
If you read it in context they do. We are talking about lens SIZE.
What’s the point buying a super tiny a6xxx when the lenses available are as big as a new born baby?
I wouldn't quite say that. Even though I also prefer Fuji lens lineup, Sony's APSC lineup has become pretty good as well now including some pretty good compact options as well. For example Sony 16-55mm f2.8 is significantly smaller and lighter compared to Fuji 18-55mm f2.8. Sony 16-70 f4, 10-20 f4 PZ, and 10-18 f4 are also compact and light. On the primes side, Sony 15mm 1.4 G, 35mm 1.8, 40mm 2.5 G, 50 2.5G etc are nice compact prime options. A frame 85mm 1.8 on a Sony APS-C body would be much smaller than the the 90mm f2 that I use on Fuji. Then you add third party offerings like Sigma 56mm 1.4, Sigma 18-50mm f2.8, Tamron 11-20 f2.8 and more.
So there are quite a few very good options in there. Sure the lineup is still not as fully fleshed out as Fuji APS-C lineup but it is pretty good. If anything my main reason to not choose Sony would be that I don't like the Sony APS-C bodies.
|
