fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of Ted ellis's message #11563772 « 1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common? »

  

Ted ellis
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common?


Ruby throat hummingbirds of course. Last year I saw some of Tim K images (posted on N&W) of hummers shot at 3200 ISO. In the past I avoided shooting hover hummers higher than 1600 ISO or f-stops below f6.3. My previous attempts the last two years were utter failures because of my lack of confidence straying away from what felt comfortable and/or I just did not have the right combinations.

I am posting five images taken over the last several days. I want to also mention I don\'t shy away from the darker images when they present themselves. The dynamics of light and dark in combination can coexist in the same image. Rembrandt did it best.

I would appreciate any and all CC.

What causes the blotting/bloching in the bgs of these shots? They are not on the images prior to posting on FM or when printed at 11x14in

Ted



May 20, 2013 at 03:40 PM
Ted ellis
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common?


Ruby throat hummingbirds of course. Last year I saw some of Tim K images (posted on N&W) of hummers shot at 3200 ISO. In the past I avoided shooting hover hummers higher than 1600 ISO or f-stops below f6.3. My previous attempts the last two years were utter failures because of my lack of confidence straying away from what felt comfortable and/or I just did not have the right combinations.

I am posting five images taken over the last several days. I want to also mention I don\'t shy away from the darker images when they present themselves. The dynamics of light and dark in combination can coexist in the same image. Rembrandt did it best.

I would appreciate any and all CC.

What causes the blotting/bloching in the bgs of these shots? They are not on the images prior to posting on FM or when printed at 11x14in

Ted



May 19, 2013 at 01:27 PM
Ted ellis
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common?


Ruby throat hummingbirds of course. Last year I saw some of Tim K images (posted on N&W) of hummers shot at 3200 ISO. In the past I avoided shooting hover hummers higher than 1600 ISO or f-stops below f6.3. My previous attempts the last two years were utter failures because of my lack of confidence straying away from what felt comfortable and/or I just did not have the right combinations.

I am posting five images taken over the last several days. I want to also mention I don\'t shy away from the darker images when they present themselves. The dynamics of light and dark in combination can coexist in the same image. Rembrandt did it best.

I would appreciate any and all CC.

What causes the blotting/bloching in the bgs of these shots? They are not on the images prior to posting on FM or when printed at 11x14in

Ted



May 19, 2013 at 01:14 PM
Ted ellis
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common?


Ruby throat hummingbirds of course. Last year I saw some of Tim K images (posted on N&W) of hummers shot at 3200 ISO. In the past I avoided shooting hover hummers higher than 1600 ISO or f-stops below f6.3. My previous attempts the last two years were utter failures because of my lack of confidence straying away from what felt comfortable and/or I just did not have the right combinations.

I am posting five images taken over the last several days. I want to also mention I don\'t shy away from the darker images when they present themselves. The dynamics of light and dark in combination can coexist in the same image. Rembrandt did it best.

I would appreciate any and all CC.

What causes the blotting/bloching in the bgs of these shots? They are not on the images prior to posting on FM or when printed at 11x14in

Ted



May 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM
Ted ellis
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common?


Ruby throat hummingbirds of course. Last year I saw some of Tim K images (posted on N&W) of hummers shot at 3200 ISO. In the past I avoided shooting hover hummers higher than 1600 ISO or f-stops below f6.3. My previous attempts the last two years were utter failures because of my lack of confidence straying away from what felt comfortable and/or I just did not have the right combinations.

I am posting five images taken over the last several days. I want to also mention I don\'t shy away from the darker images when they present themselves. The dynamics of light and dark in combination can coexist in the same image. Rembrandt did it best.

I would appreciate any and all CC.

What causes the blotting/bloching in the bgs of these shots? They are not on the images prior to posting on FM or when printed at 11x14in

Ted



May 19, 2013 at 12:19 PM
Ted ellis
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common?


Ruby throat hummingbirds of course. Last year I saw some of Tim K images (posted on N&W) of hummers shot at 3200 ISO. In the past I avoided shooting hover hummers higher than 1600 ISO or f-stops below f6.3. My previous attempts the last two years were utter failures because of my lack of confidence straying away from what felt comfortable and/or I just did not have the right combinations.

I am posting five images taken over the last several days. I want to also mention I don\'t shy away from the darker images when they present themselves. The dynamics of light and dark in combination can coexist in the same image. Rembrandt did it best.

I would appreciate any and all CC.

What causes the blotting/bloching in the bgs of these shots? They are not on the images prior to posting on FM of when printed at 11x14in

Ted



May 19, 2013 at 12:08 PM
Ted ellis
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common?


Ruby throat hummingbirds of course. Last year I saw some of Tim K images (posted on N&W) of hummers shot at 3200 ISO. In the past I avoided shooting hover hummers higher than 1600 ISO or f-stops below f6.3. My previous attempts the last two years were utter failures because of my lack of confidence straying away from what felt comfortable and/or I just did not have the right combinations.

I am posting five images taken over the last several days. I want to also mention I don\'t shy away from the darker images when they present themselves. The dynamics of light and dark in combination can coexist in the same image. Rembrandt did it best.

I would appreciate any and all CC.

What causes the blotting/bloching in the bgs of these shots? They are not on the images prior to posting on FM.

Ted



May 19, 2013 at 10:51 AM
Ted ellis
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common?


Ruby throat hummingbirds of course. Last year I saw some of Tim K images (posted on N&W) of hummers shot at 3200 ISO. In the past I avoided shooting hover hummers higher than 1600 ISO or f-stops below f6.3. My previous attempts the last two years were utter failures because of my lack of confidence straying away from what felt comfortable and/or I just did not have the right combinations.

I am posting five images taken over the last several days. I want to also mention I don\'t shy away from the darker images when they present themselves. The dynamics of light and dark in combination can coexist in the same image. Rembrandt did it best.

I would appreciate any and all CC.

What causes the blotting in the bgs of these shots? They are not on the images prior to posting on FM.

Ted



May 19, 2013 at 10:27 AM





  Previous versions of Ted ellis's message #11563772 « 1600, 2500, 3200 have what in common? »