Maybe he needed some obligatory pidjun shots to spice up the article
Bona fide pijun-in-fligh shots, good or bad, usually help to illustrate Servo AF (tracking) discussions, if there are any, that is . Also, addressing the difficulty/ keeper rate related to such shots is really required in order to understand the hardware performance.
However, some folks like to showcase their skill at the expense of objective hardware evaluation, thereby diminishing the value of their gear review.
Besides, I\'ve got 400 f/4 DO, and I don\'t need no overweight/overpriced 200-400 f/4 zoom.
Maybe he needed some obligatory pidjun shots to spice up the article
Bona fide pijun-in-fligh shots, good or bad, usually help to illustrate Servo AF (tracking) discussions, if there are any, that is . Also, addressing the difficulty/ keeper rate related to such shots is really required in order to understand the hardware performance.
However, some folks like to showcase their skill at the expense of objective hardware evaluation, thereby diminishing the value of their gear review.
Besides, I\'ve got 400 f/4 DO, and I don\'t need no overweight/overpriced 200-400 f/4 zoom.
May 14, 2013 at 06:35 PM
Previous versions of PetKal's message #11553430 « Review: Canon EF 200–400mm f/4L IS 1.4x »
. Also, addressing the difficulty/ keeper rate related to such shots is really required in order to understand the hardware performance.