Chris Beaumont wrote:
I genuinely don\'t understand so many people on this board.
So it\'s a little sharper? Is that REALLY worth >$1000 (ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS!) to some people.
Just to remind you...the range is the same, the amount of light it gathers is the same.
Are you seriously prepared to drop close to a month\'s salary on something that will not in anyway whatsoever allow you more creativity, or improve your photography in any way, shape or form, purely so that when you zoom in 100% on a monitor you can say (presumably in a nasal tone) \"mmm....yes, I would have got 4.62% less detail if I\'d stuck with my Mark One\"
haha, nice man, you show your true self there
anyway, people pay $1000 more for wide primes so why not to also get many other focal lengths added in?
Feb 07, 2012 at 05:43 PM
Previous versions of skibum5's message #10321017 « Canon 24-70 II price announced. »
