alundeb wrote:
What was the idea of comparing from two different points of view?
Lens change only, no camera/tripod reposition (didn\'t anticpate the variance).
The TSE is much longer than the Oly, so while the film plane/camera position remained constant, the front element is certainly closer (i.e. greater magnification/different perspective). I thought about reshooting before posting these, but felt it still illustrates the difference between the two lenses (@ unchanged shooting position).
I\'ll reshoot with the AOV better approximated and/or working distance equalized. Will be interesting to see those as well. It\'s a starting point for comp of these two lenses, not the final analysis.
alundeb wrote:
What was the idea of comparing from two different points of view?
Lens change only, no camera/tripod reposition (didn\'t anticpate the variance).
The TSE is much longer than the Oly, so while the film plane/camera position remained constant, the front element is certainly closer (i.e. greater magnification/different perspective). I thought about reshooting before posting these, but felt it still illustrates the difference between the two lenses (@ unchanged shooting position).
I\'ll reshoot with the AOV better approximated and/or working distance equalized. Will be interesting to see those as well. It\'s a starting point for comp of these two lenses, not the final analysis.
Jan 17, 2012 at 05:41 PM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #10256690 « Oly 24/2.8 vs. Canon 24L TS-E II »
