jamesf99 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
EB-1 wrote:
Sure, but a lot of people missed a lot of shots. Besides, the M Leicas had interchangeable lenses and there was the latter day 28-35-50. I might pay $1500 for something like that with the x100 body, though I'd prefer a 70mm on the long end.
EBH
See my original post where I said it was "not perfect". 
I agree, for the money it should have beautiful interchangeable lenses, or at least the 28050 you mentioned, but it looks like a nice camera otherwise. There also are many things left to discover about it, such as ISO performance, real IQ, handling, etc.. I'm just a fan of the size and capability to have a decent sensor (I assume) in a small camera.
What we get from Canon is far less than we should IMO, but hey, when you're a near monopoly, or part of a small oligopoly to be more precise, you pretty much don't care what customers want. You charge what you want, offer what you want, and to heck with it....
Don't forget we live in a 3rd-rate economic wasteland now with a currency barely better than monopoly money. Hence, we have no choice but to pay inflated to outrageous prices for average (in all senses of the word) goods...
|