nsarcastic Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
michael49 wrote:
I disagree.
I could afford the x1, but I won't throw away my money on one just because its a Leica. The X100 looks to be a much better camera and that's where my money would go.
Perhaps I wasn't clear. I didn't mean everyone who can afford to buy the Leica buys one, only that if you can afford it and you like the look of its files (perceived or otherwise) and/or the feeling of owning a Leica, you'll buy one regardless of the number of technological advances it might have (or, in the case of the x1, not have). They price their stuff, like the x1, in a manner similar to, say, Porsche. You can find other cars that objectively outperform them at a fraction of the cost, but there is a certain segment of society that will say there is no substitute and think that the high price they paid makes them feel special for owning one. Fuji, Canon, Nikon, etc. cameras have become commodities where they try to pack as much gewgaws into their stuff as possible to compete with each other, while brands like Leica rely more upon their uniqueness and brand loyalty and cachet.
|