justruss Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Graham Mitchell wrote:
I hope not. Some of my layered Photoshop files are already approaching 1GB, and that's just with 22MP 16bit base files (and I'm using a modest amount of layers). A 6GB Photoshop file would be a nightmare to work with, and to store, and it's even too large for the .PSD file format!
Yes, you will always find some art repro or landscape photographers who want maximum resolution no matter what, but it becomes a smaller and smaller niche.
But Graham, photographers have been shooting with 22mp digital backs (and I'm not talking about scanning backs) for OVER 7 years by now-- and 35mm is already at higher mp counts. So you're in some ways complaining about generations-old camera gear being too overpowered.
As Thrice mentioned, computer processing power and storage continue to increase at least as fast as camera technology.
And 1 GB files really aren't that big for stills. And let's not even get into what processing 1080P (or higher!) HD video requires-- and the video people continue to survive. In other words, shooting stills ain't nuthin, and 150 MP cameras will definitely arrive in the not too distant future (let's not forget that the scanning back people are ALREADY dealing with equivalent files).
|