IndyFab Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
philber wrote:
IndyFab, you are out of luck with the 21 ZE, because the Contax version is essentially the same price, around 1500$ (or was at least, the last time I looked).
You could buy a very good wide angle, though not as good as the 21, in the 28mm f:2.8, either in ZE form, or, much cheaper, in Contax version.
There are 100mm Contax alternatives, such as the superlative 100mm f:2.0, but they are not easy to find (none right now at KEH or Adorama)
But you could get a very good and very cheap 50mm Planar f:1.7 for less than $200, plus adapter. And, if you buy the 100 macro, you won't be needing themacro capability of the 50.
Hope this helps...Show more →
Philber,
Thank you so much, Thats exactally the kind of info I was looking for.
Great perspective on the 50 , as to having the macro abillitiess in the 100
Quick question since you bummped me upto the 28, from the 21 , should I consider the 35
I do presently own a Tokina 11 16 , but considered selling it if i got a WA Zeiss for its color rendidtion.. Rome wasnt buit in 1 day, so I can always get the WA later on . As the tokina will keep me in the WA for awhile.
In that case which would be better 28 or 35 and what 35
J'ai de la famille dans le Souh de la France
|