if it was all done in lightroom then it's a local adjustment using clarity pumped to the max to highlight the tear
alternatively the Hoffmaister recognized that the tear made the shot that much more yummelicious so he dragged the sucker into photoshop and then did some majeek there.
if it was all done in lightroom then it's a local adjustment using clarity pumped to the max to highlight the tear
alternatively the Hoffmaister recognized that the tear made the shot that much more yummelicious so he dragged the sucker into photoshop and then did some majeek there.
StevePerry wrote:
don't make ASSumptions across the internet.
Don't call me an ASS without first seeing the size of my RUMP. Then you can call me an ass.
The "dollhouse effect" is pretty commonly associated with tilt-shift lenses.... I just figured that since you didn't know what made the image look that way, you might not know that a tilt-shift could do that. Maybe I was wrong. Maybe I was an ass. Maybe I'm fine with that, too.
I pulled both images into photoshop and the difference is enormous.
If this is just a simple processing of the image difference then kudos to you for figuring out a way to accentuate that most important detail while at the same time also getting a GREAT overall rendition of the image.
I'm hoping I guessed correctly in terms of adjustment brush but wrong mode (not clarity).
Either way... whether you tell us or not that's somewhat irrelevant (but others want to know). The takeaway here was the accentuating of the tear... not the "how to"
