philip_pj
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
|
The best solution (as much as any adaptor-mounted lens can be) is generally held by afficionados to be the Fotodiox. You are very likely to get the best results out if it, and you have to feel you are worth it for the unalloyed pleasure of using a CZ lens on a modern Canon.
What I am waiting for is the definitive EOS adapter shootout, comparo, smoke me out...everyone has the same questions and still it remains a black insider's art. Can I get away with a cheapie? Which one? Are the expensive ones worth it? The optical system breaks down without a high quality adapter, and it already adds a non-design factor to weaken the factory designed/developed bayonet-body join, a very refined effort. (Same issue for NEX, etc. except when heavy/large lenses are used, extra load is placed on the mount design and its resistance to flex.)
This should be pretty easy: get a starting list of popular contenders, decide a sound methodology, pick a wide, a normal and a tele, and shoot MFD and infinity, then pixel peep away...check the slop and fit, quality of materials and finish; has anyone done this? The age of alt lenses is upon us, whole formats are being helped along substantially by them, makers are encouraging adaper use, Sony released the NEX with 1-2 lenses, doubtlessly believing enthusiasts will want to mount their M lenses etc. instead. Adapters are here to stay.
Not too many nice shots, TooManyShots, always room for more like those.
|
