Thanks, kevin! I'm very happy you like it. I just kind of fell into doing these flower shots and would never have done any more had it not been for the amazing outpouring of positive commentary I got on this website for my first shot - that of a rose. I never thought of myself as having any affinity for flowers, other than I like them. I know a number of people who have take courses in flower photography but I just did it on my own. So, although I have a formula for how I light them, each flower takes a little bit different processing. I guess I could write something about that sometime. I'm hoping to get 100 of these together into a coffee table book someday.
All the best,
Endre
kevindar wrote:
Its lovely. You should write a book or tutorial on shooting b&w flowers if you have not already.
Your Dahlia image is absolutely stunning, I hope you know that. Not much of a flower shooter myself, but its really exceptional, as are many of your other still life.
I have long learned that it is much easier to hit the creativity wall, than the technical and knowledge one. So I often try to compensate by getting as much knowledge and getting the best gear.
I really enjoy your work, and I know I am not the only one.
Thanks, again, Kevin! You are too kind and i really appreciate it! I have learned what I know by knowing what I want to do and then finding a way to do it. I have very little equipment - a good camera (Canon 5D) and good Canon lenses. I'm behind the curve in that I still use CS 2. I also have some Alien Bee's lights but for these flower shots I always use natural light. Up until very recently I have done a lot of improvising to get shots the way I want and even now I think a lot of people would probably be quite surprised by how minimal my equipment is.
All best wishes,
Endre
kevindar wrote:
Your Dahlia image is absolutely stunning, I hope you know that. Not much of a flower shooter myself, but its really exceptional, as are many of your other still life.
I have long learned that it is much easier to hit the creativity wall, than the technical and knowledge one. So I often try to compensate by getting as much knowledge and getting the best gear.
I really enjoy your work, and I know I am not the only one.
Great light, composition, and conversion. I am a little troubled by the stamen being what seems soft compared to the petals on the left side of the image. This could have been a re-sizing artifact.
Jim
Thanks for your kind comments, Jim. I'm happy you like it! Unfortunately, I can't see what it is you are troubled about either on my computer or on web page. Maybe it is something peculiar to your computer.
All the best,
Endre
Grenache wrote:
Great light, composition, and conversion. I am a little troubled by the stamen being what seems soft compared to the petals on the left side of the image. This could have been a re-sizing artifact.
Jim
Thank you, Patsy. I'm so glad you like it. I'd be happy to teach you although you'd get all my secrets. Maybe if I like those Blood Lilies of yours, you can bring them up and I'll shoot them and then you can watch me mess around with what I get.
All best wishes,
Endre
platscha wrote:
As always, a perfect image, a stunning image, no softness I can detect. Sign me up for a class, I would love some Endre Education.
Sounds like a deal to me, actually I would just love to treat you to something you won't find very often, I know these are somewhat rare even if I don't know their name.
Well, Patsy, If I teach you everything, I'll then be forced to have to kill you! Muehahahahahaha!
I'm very curious to see that flower.
All the best,
Endre
platscha wrote:
Sounds like a deal to me, actually I would just love to treat you to something you won't find very often, I know these are somewhat rare even if I don't know their name.
Check your private message, sent you a link to really bad photo of flower, done with a really secret technique, in total darkness with a tiny flash light, don't let my secret out.
I PM'd you back. I love your minimal technique. Seriously! You ought to try it on some other things.
All the best,
Endre
platscha wrote:
Check your private message, sent you a link to really bad photo of flower, done with a really secret technique, in total darkness with a tiny flash light, don't let my secret out.
Thanks, Eric. I appreciate your comment! Regarding that little petal: it all depends on how you look at it. That is where the light hit that petal, as i did for the petal just to it's left and further to the right about 3 o'clock. My eyes trace an arc between them so they don't bother me. Thanks for pointing it out, though, so I could think about it.
All best wishes,
Endre
eric kim wrote:
Exceptional work as always Endre. However, that little petal on the bottom right seems to be popping out of nowhere.
I know a number of people who have take courses in flower photography but I just did it on my own. So, although I have a formula for how I light them, each flower takes a little bit different processing. I guess I could write something about that sometime. I'm hoping to get 100 of these together into a coffee table book someday.
I have learned what I know by knowing what I want to do and then finding a way to do it. I have very little equipment - a good camera (Canon 5D) and good Canon lenses. I'm behind the curve in that I still use CS 2. I also have some Alien Bee's lights but for these flower shots I always use natural light. Up until very recently I have done a lot of improvising to get shots the way I want and even now I think a lot of people would probably be quite surprised by how minimal my equipment is.
Maybe if I like those Blood Lilies of yours, you can bring them up and I'll shoot them and then you can watch me mess around with what I get.