fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2009 · Hudson II

  
 
sbeme
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Hudson II


appreciate your critique

Scott



Nov 09, 2009 at 05:55 PM
Bob Jarman
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Hudson II


Well done Scott, both this and Hudson at Dawn...the pilings serve to rein in the eye and direct attention directly ahead.

How would it look with a slight blur applied to the skyline?

regards,

Bob



Nov 09, 2009 at 09:18 PM
AuntiPode
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Hudson II


Beyond the low contrast, there's something odd about the buildings on the skyline.


Nov 09, 2009 at 09:23 PM
Bob Jarman
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Hudson II


Barrel distortion?


Nov 10, 2009 at 08:11 AM
mrchile
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · Hudson II


Bob Jarman wrote:
Barrel distortion?

Looks like camera tilt. A 1degree CCW twist would straighten things up.
I think this was shot about 5-10 minutes too late. The sun coming through the buildings would make a neat image, but it fights with the pier for attention in this one. The light would be a little more even, making for an easier exposure. You can always add contrast if needed.



Nov 10, 2009 at 08:27 AM
sbeme
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · Hudson II


Thanks for all the feedback folks.

Some selective dodging, burning and sharpening of the buildings, perhaps too unevenly applied. Perhaps thats what you are responding to Karen?

Bob,
I felt that the eye was meant to go to the City and it would therefore need to be sharp.

Scott



Nov 19, 2009 at 11:19 PM
Bob Jarman
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Hudson II


Scott,

I agree, perhaps a slight foreground blur would help 'seeing' the depth?

Bob



Nov 20, 2009 at 07:46 AM
Kaden K.
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · Hudson II


I like the leading line flanked as is. The wood floor looks seriously over sharpened
and it becomes difficult to distinguish the weeds but the white budding flowers are
a charming touch. The buildings across the water looked blurred in some parts
and overly sharpened/compressed in some details. The water lost definition with
the occasional black line or group of lines.

The issues here are of contrast and sharpening. Did you use a filter at all?

I suggest the reverse - Don't over sharpen the bridge and blur the background.



Nov 20, 2009 at 11:46 AM
sbeme
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · Hudson II


Kaden,
I appreciate the detailed assessment and suggestions.
No filter used (except a protective, high quality, clear filter). It is interesting how the buildings far left are more blurred, despite selective sharpening applied over the entire cityscape. Might be softness at the edges of the lens. I'd have to check to see if any softness was eliminated on the right by a crop but I think this was a minimally cropped image.
Scott



Nov 20, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Bob Jarman
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Hudson II


#1 - what I had in mind

http://www.aug.edu/rjarman/Photos/FM_POSTS/hudson_rw.jpg

#2 - perhaps what Kaden suggested, Kaden?

http://www.aug.edu/rjarman/Photos/FM_POSTS/hudson_k.jpg

Think I prefer Kaden's suggestion - although I probably applied too much blur...



Nov 20, 2009 at 07:24 PM





FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account