digitalbug30d wrote:
why have another thread of bitching and chart scientists professing the trials and tribulations of Noise vs. SNR vs pixel density vs. really taking the damn pictures already...
for all your bitching about the chart peepers some of our (only barely started) websites already have far more photos up than yours
Fidelity wrote:
I'm also curious why there isn't a 1D4 master thread. It obviously is the best DSLR ever produced. It is a MASSIVE upgrade over the 1D3 (60% rez improvement, herculean AF and tracking improvement, ISO improvement, etc. etc.). And thank God it is 1.3x instead of a rez- and-reach-castrated or overpriced FF. Nothing deserves a master thread as much as the 1D4. Now, if we could just find some way to channel the FF-head whiners about the 1.3x into a whiners thread, then the rest of us 1.3x-philes could have a good-old-time.
I often come across the lack of reach with the FF version compared to 1.3x crop, wonder why?
jamesf99 wrote:
Then, a few months later, when people realize that they don't have a staff of 43 people to help with video production and processing (ala the shill video from Laforet where a full 1/3 of it was "credits") the reality will set in.
43 people? Have you worked on any small video shoots. 3.4 people is closer to reality.
