sboerup wrote:
Not to be insulting, I'm just surprised people worry about this much CA in their pics. I mean, its hardly noticeable at 100%, something you wont see in a print. // end rant
No offense taken... however, CA is very, very visible (at least to a trained,e.g., photographer's eye) at anything above 4x6. Just pay attention to it in magazines and you will notice it already in single-page images (where photographers did not bother to remove it, of course). Also, there are instances where images are printed equivalent to 100% screen viewing (e.g., bridal portraits)... in the example of my image above, it would take a 24"x30" print to see the detail as if viewed on screen at 100%. These days more and more clients require original files on a disk (or full-size files online), and they view them on their computer screens... and you can not really count on them not being tech-savy enough to find the 100% view button.
I think LCA is fine in most situation. There is only one situation I hate to see LCA - the jewelry photography. If you shoot platinum rings, LCA is very very distracting. Normally, I'd stop down to prevent this problem. Other than that, most clients won't notice the existence of LCA.
