weezintrumpete Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
ISO1600 wrote:
man, i think the Rokkor looks completely boring and the Zuiko is poop, disguised as a lens.
The Nikkor 35/1.4 is such a sweet lens for the money (unless you pay what it normally goes for these days haha).
Tell us how you really feel 
thrice - I really don't have a problem with it. I use a combination of the af-confirm chip and my judgment and it usually gets me pretty darn close most of the time. I don't know how well calibrated my viewfinder is nor do I have the EE-S screen (I have the stock one).
I really wish I could make the Minolta work since I feel that it is the prefect combination of speed, weight and size. It is also the most enjoyable to use with its silky smooth focusing and snappy aperture ring. Overall, it's just a beautiful lens and I wish I could make it work for me.
I wish I had some better photos from both the Olympus and Minolta to compare against the Nikon as I feel the photos I posted from the Nikon show it off much better than the respective photos from the other two lenses. I DO like the Zuiko at f/2.8 and might keep one of them as a general walk around since it's so small and light.
If anyone is interested in the Zuiko or Rokkor, let me know as I'm pretty sure that I've decided to keep the Nikkor. For me and the type of shooting I do, f/1.4 is too hard to pass up.
Also, if anyone wants to see some comparison shots from the three, let me know.
Patrick
|