fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
FM Forum Rules
Wedding Resource List
  

FM Forums | Wedding Photographer | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3       4              end
  

Archive 2009 · 13

  
 
mcarr
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #1 · 13


hyperion wrote:
Read the full post.

Examples at the time of the wedding. Not this forum.

Those examples will help calm peoples gear fears.


Or, you could just use good equipment and never have to defend your gear choice. Seriously, I think the spirit of the thread here is if you're charging $5k+ for a wedding and you show up with a couple rebels and kit lenses, you're a tool no matter how talented you are. Now where the price points/gear used lines fall exactly is certainly up for debate, but if you have aspirations to make more than you are now, you should try to use equipment comensurate with your desired future rate.



Jul 06, 2009 at 11:41 AM
G Lund
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #2 · 13


The_Duke_Of_El wrote:
Why all the flaming?

Equipment is much more of a facilitator than anything else. The Xsi and the MKIII may show similar results at ISO100 in a controlled studio environment, but throw in a dark wedding hall, and it becomes much harder with the Xsi, but not impossible.

Before taking a bite out of Sam take a minute to de-lace the humor from perspective and focus on the latter.

Of course a Rebel and kit lens isn't going to replace a high-end photographer (based on ability, talent and execution, as well as gear) for couples that can budget for one.

The reality remains
...Show more

To the first pargraph above...I disagree with this statement...I feel the major difference is in the lens...I can get pretty much the same result from my XSI with my 24-70 L as I can with my 5D with the same lens easily at ISO 800. And sense I rarely go over ISO 400 I see no issues most of the time...there are exceptions but very few.
And when it comes down to viewing the final product in print...and it would only be a guess as to what camera shot what picture....who cares what the photog took the pic with to get that result. I have seen some amazing shots from Canons G series cameras.
George



Jul 06, 2009 at 02:11 PM
Pandacat
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #3 · 13


Oh Lord, won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz. My friends all have Porsche's. I must make amends....


Jul 06, 2009 at 06:37 PM
Sam Hassas
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #4 · 13


hyperion wrote:
Strange post. Trying to justify your purchase? Why come to a forum and tell others what equipment to buy?

Professionals never do that. Professionals produce results and have the people skills to avoid "gear talk" or "gear rumors" with guests.

TIP FOR YOU TO AVOID GEAR TALK AND GEAR REPUTATION:

To answer the last part of your post - I have seen pros rock weddings with Nikon D70's even while there were guests using Canon 5DIIs. They were smart enough to do an engagement shoot with the couple before the wedding, produced an amazing 3 foot tall print hung during the wedding
...Show more

Thank you. I'll put this in the report.
/sarcasm



Jul 06, 2009 at 08:21 PM
Jos Tesseract
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #5 · 13


jcolman wrote:
I've got something the Bob's don't have......

....an assistant. I win.


If that was a question, I would've guessed "a clue"



Jul 06, 2009 at 08:38 PM
khanhfat
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.5 #6 · 13


but still better camera still helps you alot in low light situation and fast action. The dynamic range in FF can help you recover some blown out pics and such. Idk, if you're getting paid you better have the equipment + skills to capture the wedding that no others could do .

So if u're planning not to use flash during the wedding is probably better gear . That's just depends on the photographer's taste on how he will choose his equipment



Jul 07, 2009 at 09:52 AM
1       2       3       4              end




FM Forums | Wedding Photographer | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3       4              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account